Competition Commission v Murray and Roberts Limited (CR128Mar11/SA153Oct15) [2015] ZACT 128; [2015] 2 CPLR 571 (CT) (9 December 2015)
The Tribunal found that Murray & Roberts Limited, through its subsidiaries and divisions, engaged in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market allocation in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act. The respondent admitted to the conduct and agreed to cooperate with the Commission, refrain from future prohibited practices, and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement was comprehensive, addressed the contraventions, and included appropriate undertakings and penalties. The agreement was confirmed as an order of the Tribunal, concluding all proceedings between the parties in respect of the specified conduct.
- Citation
- [2015] ZACT 128
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: Murray & Roberts Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 9 December 2015
- Case Number
- CR128Mar11/SA153Oct15
- Procedural Posture
- Settlement Confirmation / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
- Outcome
- Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings accepted.
- Judges
- N Manoim, A Wessels, I Valodia
- Legal Topics
- Collusive Tendering, Price Fixing, Market Allocation, Administrative Penalty, Consent Agreement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
Murray & Roberts Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Settlement Confirmation / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Murray & Roberts Limited, through its subsidiaries and divisions, engaged in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market allocation in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act.
- 2 Whether the settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Murray & Roberts Limited should be confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- 3 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate under the Competition Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that Murray & Roberts Limited, through its subsidiaries and divisions, engaged in collusive tendering, price fixing, and market allocation in contravention of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act. The respondent admitted to the conduct and agreed to cooperate with the Commission, refrain from future prohibited practices, and pay an administrative penalty. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement was comprehensive, addressed the contraventions, and included appropriate undertakings and penalties. The agreement was confirmed as an order of the Tribunal, concluding all proceedings between the parties in respect of the specified conduct.
Court Disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed and undertakings accepted.
Orders
- The settlement agreement between the Competition Commission and Murray & Roberts Limited is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Murray & Roberts Limited shall pay an administrative penalty of R64,141,798.86 to the Competition Commission by 31 August 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment