Competition Commission v Oceana Group Ltd and Another (50/CR/May12) [2012] ZACT 40; [2012] 2 CPLR 237 (CT) (19 June 2012)
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Oceana Brands and Oceana Group, finding that the respondents admitted to contraventions of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, including price fixing, market allocation, and non-compete agreements. The administrative penalty of R34,750,050, representing 5% of Oceana Brands' affected turnover for 2010, was deemed appropriate and proportionate to the contraventions. The Tribunal accepted Oceana's undertakings to cooperate with the Commission, cease the prohibited conduct, and implement a compliance programme. The order constitutes full and final settlement of all proceedings investigated under the...
- Citation
- [2012] ZACT 40
- Parties
- Applicant: Competition Commission; Respondent: Oceana Group Ltd; Respondent: Oceana Brands Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2012
- Case Number
- 50/CR/May12
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
- Outcome
- Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Undertakings for future compliance accepted.
- Judges
- N Manoim, Y Carrim, A Wessels
- Legal Topics
- Price Fixing, Market Allocation, Administrative Penalty, Non Compete Agreement, Horizontal Agreements, Compliance Programme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant
Oceana Group Ltd
Respondent
Oceana Brands Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Oceana Brands and Oceana Group contravened section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act by engaging in price fixing, market allocation, and non-compete agreements.
- 2 Whether the administrative penalty imposed is appropriate under the Competition Act.
- 3 Whether the consent agreement and undertakings by Oceana are sufficient to prevent future contraventions.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Oceana Brands and Oceana Group, finding that the respondents admitted to contraventions of section 4(1)(b) of the Competition Act, including price fixing, market allocation, and non-compete agreements. The administrative penalty of R34,750,050, representing 5% of Oceana Brands' affected turnover for 2010, was deemed appropriate and proportionate to the contraventions. The Tribunal accepted Oceana's undertakings to cooperate with the Commission, cease the prohibited conduct, and implement a compliance programme. The order constitutes full and final settlement of all proceedings investigated under the...
Court Disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalty imposed. Undertakings for future compliance accepted.
Orders
- Oceana Brands to pay an administrative penalty of R34,750,050 to the Competition Commission within three months of the order.
- Oceana to cooperate fully with the Commission in relation to the prosecution of the complaint upon referral, including providing evidence and witnesses.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment