Competition Commission v Pelchem Soc Limited (CO150Oct16) [2016] ZACT 108; [2016] 2 CPLR 659 (CT) (7 December 2016)
- Citation
- [2016] ZACT 108
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- M Mazwai, A Ndoni, I Valodia
- Case number
- CO150Oct16
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- M Mazwai, A Ndoni, I Valodia
- Case number
- CO150Oct16
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Pelchem SOC Limited. The Tribunal found that the undertakings by Pelchem to remove exclusivity and evergreen clauses from its agreements, and its commitment not to enter into future exclusive supply arrangements for surface fluorination services, were sufficient to address the alleged contraventions of sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal accepted that Pelchem had cooperated fully with the Commission and had ceased the alleged conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement settles the complaint and concludes the investigation into Pelchem's conduct in the relevant market.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed; complaint settled and investigation concluded.
Orders
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Pelchem SOC Limited is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Pelchem SOC Limited must remove all exclusivity and evergreen duration clauses from its existing Joint Development Agreements involving surface fluorination services.
- Pelchem SOC Limited must not enter into any future exclusive supply agreements for surface fluorination services for HDPE fuel pipes, fuel tanks, HOPE and PP pails/buckets, and electric cables.
- This order settles and concludes the complaint under Commission case number 2013DEC0615.
02
Material facts
Parties
Competition Commission
Applicant Counsel: Thembinkosi BonakelePelchem SOC Limited
Respondent Counsel: Rajen Naidoo03
Procedural history
Posture
Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether Pelchem SOC Limited's exclusive supply agreements contravened sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Competition Act.
- 02
Whether the consent agreement adequately addresses the alleged anti-competitive conduct.
- 03
Whether Pelchem's undertakings are sufficient to restore competition in the relevant market.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Competition Commission argued that Pelchem SOC Limited entered into exclusive supply agreements with Marley Pipe Systems and other third parties, which restricted competition in the market for surface fluorination services for HDPE fuel pipes and related products. The Commission contended that these agreements prevented competitors, such as Colvic Petroleum Products, from entering the market, thereby contravening sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Competition Act. The Commission sought confirmation of a consent agreement in which Pelchem would remove exclusivity clauses and refrain from future exclusive supply arrangements.
- Respondent
- Pelchem SOC Limited did not admit liability for any prohibited conduct under the Competition Act but agreed to cooperate fully with the Commission. Pelchem undertook to remove all exclusivity and evergreen duration clauses from its existing agreements and committed not to enter into any future exclusive supply agreements for surface fluorination services. Pelchem confirmed that it had ceased the alleged conduct and provided truthful disclosure and cooperation during the investigation.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 5(1) and 8(c)
Exclusive supply agreements that restrict market access for competitors may constitute prohibited practices under sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Competition Act.
- 02
Competition Act 89 of 1998, section 49D read with section 58(1)(b)
Consent agreements confirmed by the Tribunal may settle complaints and conclude investigations into alleged anti-competitive conduct.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Pelchem SOC Limited. The Tribunal found that the undertakings by Pelchem to remove exclusivity and evergreen clauses from its agreements, and its commitment not to enter into future exclusive supply arrangements for surface fluorination services, were sufficient to address the alleged contraventions of sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Competition Act. The Tribunal accepted that Pelchem had cooperated fully with the Commission and had ceased the alleged conduct. The confirmation of the consent agreement settles the complaint and concludes the investigation into Pelchem's conduct in the relevant market.
Obiter and limits
- Pelchem's cooperation with the Commission is noted as exemplary and in line with the objectives of the Competition Act.
- The Tribunal encourages parties to resolve competition complaints through consent agreements where appropriate, as this promotes efficient resolution and compliance.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed; complaint settled and investigation concluded.
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Pelchem SOC Limited is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Pelchem SOC Limited must remove all exclusivity and evergreen duration clauses from its existing Joint Development Agreements involving surface fluorination services.
- Pelchem SOC Limited must not enter into any future exclusive supply agreements for surface fluorination services for HDPE fuel pipes, fuel tanks, HOPE and PP pails/buckets, and electric cables.
- This order settles and concludes the complaint under Commission case number 2013DEC0615.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
competitiontribunal
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No: C01500ct16
ln the matter between:
The Competition Commission Applicant
And
Pelchem SOC Limited Respondent
Panel
: M Mazwai (Presiding Member)
A Ndoni(Tribunal Member)
M Mazwai (Tribunal Member)
Heard on
: 07 December 2016
Decided on
: 07 December 2016
Consent Agreement
The Tribunal hereby confirms the consent agreement as agreed to by the
Competition Commission and Pelchem SOC Limited annexed hereto marked "A".
07 December 2016
Date
______
Presiding Member
Ms Mondo Mazwai
Concurring: Ms Andiswa Ndoni and Prof. I Valodia
IN
THE
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL
OF SOUTH
AFRICA
HELD
IN
PRETORIA
CT
CASE NO:_____
CC CASE NO: 2013DEC0615
In the matter between:
THE
COMPETITION
COMMISSION
Applicant
AND
PELCHEM
SOC
LIMITED
Respondent
CONSENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND
PELCHEM (SOC) LIMITED
The Competition Commission and Pelchem (SOC) Limited in the above matter hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for an order In terms of section 490 read with section 58(1)(b) of the Competition Act no. 89 of 1998, as amended {"the Act"), on the terms set out more fully below.
1
DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply:
1.1 "Act" means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended.
1.2 “Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
1.3 "Complaint" means the complaint submitted by Colvic Petroleum Products (Pty) Ltd and Colvic Marketing & Engineering (Pty) Ltd in terms of section 498(2)(b) under case number 2013Dec0615.
1.4 “Consent Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Pelchem.
1.5 "HOPE" means high density polyethylene.
1.6 "Joint Development Agreement” means the agreement signed between Pelchem (SOC) Limited and Marley Pipe Systems (Pty) Limited whereby Pelchem (SOC) Limited will exclusively supply surface fluorination services for polyethylene pipes and fittings to Marley Pipe Systems (Pty) Limited who will purchase such services on an exclusive basis from Pelchem and not use any competing products from alternate suppliers.
1.7 “Marley" means Marley Pipe Systems (Pty) Limited, a company incorporated In terms of the laws of South Africa, with its principal place of business at No. 1Bickley Road, Nigel, Gauteng.
1.8 "Parties" means the Commission and Pelchem.
1.9 "Pelchem" means Pelchem (SOC) Limited, a state-owned company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa with its principal place of business at Pelindaba, Church Street West Extension in Brits, North West.
1.10 "PP" means Polypropylene.
1.11 "Tribunal" means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body establ shed in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C}, the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.
2
THE
COMPLAINT
AND
COMPLAINTINVESTIGATION
2.1 On 18 December 2013, the Commission received the Complaint and decided to investigate the Complaint in terms of section 498(3) of the Act.
2.2 The Complainant alleged that Pelchem and Marley have entered into a Joint Development Agreement in terms of which Pelchem is required to only surface fluorinate Marley's HOPE fuel pipes in South Africa. As a result of this Joint Development Agreement between Pelchem and Marley, Colvic alleges that it cannot enter the market for the supply of fluorinated HOPE fuel pipes.
2.3 The Commission assessed the alleged conduct in terms of the Act. Following its investigation, the Commission found the following:
2.3.1 Pelchem is the sole supplier of surface fluorination services in South Africa. Fluorination is the process whereby fluorine is used to treat various products in order to modify and improve their permeation and adhesion characteristics.
2.3.2 Marley is a manufacturer of HOPE pipes for various applications, such as pumping systems at fuel filling stations. Such pipes needs to be fluorinated to prevent the fuel from leaking through the walls of the pipes.
2.3.3 On or about 10 December 2013 Pelchem concluded an ever green Joint Development Agreement with Martey in terms of which Pelchem would exclusively supply its surface fluorination services in respect of HOPE fuel pipes to Marley in South Africa.
2.3.4 Pelchem also entered into similar exclusive Joint Development Agreements with third parties in terms of which Pelchem would exclusively supply its surface fluorination services for (i) fuel tanks; (ii) HOPE and PP pails/bucket; and (iii) electric cables respectively.
3 CO-OPERATION
3.1 Pelchem has:
3.1.1 Provided the Commission with truthful and timely disclosure,
including information and documents in its possession or under its control, relating to the alleged prohibited practices.
3.1.2 Provided full and expeditious co-operation to the Commission concerning the alleged prohibited practices.
3.1.3 Ceased to engage in, and will not in future engage in, any form of alleged prohibited practice.
3.1.4 Confirmed that it has not destroyed, falsified or concealed
information, evidence and documents relating to the alleged prohibited practices.
3.1.5 Confirmed that it has not misrepresented or made a wilful or negligent misrepresentation concerning the material facts or otherwise acted dishonestly.
4
UNDERTAKINGS
4.1 Pelchem undertakes that it will remove all clauses relating to exclusivity and evergreen duration from its existing Joint Development Agreements that involve the provision of surface fluorination services in respect of (i) HOPE pipes; (ii) fuel tanks; (iii) HOPE and PP pails/buckets; and (iv) electric cables.
4.2 Pelchem undertakes that it will not, In the future, enter into any exclusive supply agreements for the provision of surface fluorination services for, including but not limited to, HDPE fuel pipes, fuel tanks, HOPE and PP pails/buckets and electric cables.
5
GENERAL
5.1 Pelchem makes no admission of liability of any kind whatsoever for any prohibited conduct under the Act on its part.
5.2 This agreement, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, is in settlement of and concludes the Complaint between the Commission and Pelchem relating to the alleged contravention by Pelchem of sections 5(1) and 8(c) of the Act that is the subject of or was investigated under the Commission case number 2013DEC0615.
For Pelchem (SOC) Limited
Dated and signed at Pretoria on the 21st day of October 2016
______
RAJEN
NAIDOO (Duly Authorized)
ACTING MANAGING DIRECTOR - PELCHEM (SOC) LTD
For the Commission
Dated and signed at Pretoria on the 21st day of October 2016
_____
THEMBINKOSI
BONAKELE
COMMISSIONER - THE COMPETITION COMMISSION
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.