Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Retail Capital (Pty) Ltd and Another (CO078Jul20) [2020] ZACT 64 (5 August 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed that Retail Capital and First Asset Finance contravened section 13A(3) of the Competition Act by implementing the merger prior to approval. The parties voluntarily disclosed the contravention and cooperated with the Commission. The administrative penalty of R742,500, payable in ten monthly instalments, was deemed appropriate and proportionate, considering the voluntary disclosure and absence of aggravating factors. The undertakings to notify future mergers, refrain from prior implementation, and implement a compliance programme were accepted as sufficient to prevent recurrence. The consent agreement was confirmed as an order, concluding all proceedings related to the contravention.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement is confirmed as an order of the Competition Tribunal.
  • Retail Capital shall pay an administrative penalty of R742,500 in ten equal monthly instalments of R74,250, with the first instalment due within 30 days of confirmation.
  • Interest will accrue on unpaid amounts in terms of section 80(1) of the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 for any amounts not paid within a year from confirmation.
  • The penalty shall be paid into the Commission's designated bank account and transferred to the National Revenue Fund as required by section 59(4) of the Competition Act.
  • The respondents shall submit a copy of their competition law compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation.
  • All proceedings relating to the contravention of section 13A(3) by the respondents are concluded.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

Retail Capital (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

First Asset Finance (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty Total: ZAR 742,500
  • Monthly Instalment: ZAR 74,250

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order / Confirmation of Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that Retail Capital and First Asset Finance implemented a notifiable intermediate merger in November 2018 without prior approval, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that the parties voluntarily disclosed the error and subsequently notified the merger, which was approved without conditions. The Commission sought confirmation of the consent agreement, including the imposition of an administrative penalty and undertakings to prevent future contraventions.
Respondent
Retail Capital and First Asset Finance admitted liability for contravening section 13A(3) by implementing the merger before approval. They explained the error was bona fide and voluntarily disclosed it to the Commission. The respondents agreed to pay an administrative penalty, to refrain from future prior implementation, and to implement a competition law compliance programme to prevent recurrence.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 13A(3) of the Competition Act, 1998

    Parties to an intermediate merger may not implement the merger until it has been approved by the Competition Commission, with or without conditions.

  2. 02

    Sections 49D, 58(1)(b), and 59(1)(d) of the Competition Act, 1998

    The Competition Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement as an order, and administrative penalties may be imposed for contraventions, not exceeding 10% of annual turnover.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed that Retail Capital and First Asset Finance contravened section 13A(3) of the Competition Act by implementing the merger prior to approval. The parties voluntarily disclosed the contravention and cooperated with the Commission. The administrative penalty of R742,500, payable in ten monthly instalments, was deemed appropriate and proportionate, considering the voluntary disclosure and absence of aggravating factors. The undertakings to notify future mergers, refrain from prior implementation, and implement a compliance programme were accepted as sufficient to prevent recurrence. The consent agreement was confirmed as an order, concluding all proceedings related to the contravention.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of voluntary disclosure and cooperation by merging parties in resolving contraventions efficiently.
  • The implementation of a compliance programme is a positive step towards ensuring future adherence to competition law requirements.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings concluded.

  • The consent agreement is confirmed as an order of the Competition Tribunal.
  • Retail Capital shall pay an administrative penalty of R742,500 in ten equal monthly instalments of R74,250, with the first instalment due within 30 days of confirmation.
  • Interest will accrue on unpaid amounts in terms of section 80(1) of the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 for any amounts not paid within a year from confirmation.
  • The penalty shall be paid into the Commission's designated bank account and transferred to the National Revenue Fund as required by section 59(4) of the Competition Act.
  • The respondents shall submit a copy of their competition law compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of confirmation.
  • All proceedings relating to the contravention of section 13A(3) by the respondents are concluded.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2020] ZACT 64

SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CO078Jul20

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission

Applicant

And

Retail Capital (Pty) Ltd

First Respondent

First Asset Finance (Pty) Ltd

Second Respondent

Panel: Y Carrim (Presiding Member), AW Wessels (Tribunal Member), F Tregenna (Tribunal Member)

Heard on: 05 August 2020

Decided on: 05 August 2020

CONSENT

AGREEMENT

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 89 OF 1998), AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND,

RETAIL CAPITAL PTY LTD AND FIRST ASSET FINANCE PTY LTD IN RESPECT OF AN ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 13A(3) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998.

1.

PREAMBLE

The Competition Commission and, Retail Capital Pty Ltd and First Asset Finance Pty Ltd hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of this consent agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of section 49D read with sections 58(1)(b) and 59(1)(d) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended on the terms set out below:

2.

DEFINITIONS

For the purposes of this consent agreement the following definitions shall apply:

2.1. “Act” means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

2.2. “Commission” means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

2.3. “Consent Agreement” means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and the Respondents;

2.4. “Days” means business days;

2.5. “FAF” means First Asset Finance Pty Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 145 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, Cape Town, 7915, the primary target firm;

2.6. “Merging Parties” means Retail Capital and FAF;

2.7. “Retail Capital” means Retail Capital Pty Ltd, a company duly incorporated in accordance with the applicable laws of the Republic of South Africa, with its principal place of business at 145 Sir Lowry Road, Woodstock, Cape Town;

2.8. “Respondents” mean Retail Capital and FAF;

2.9. “The Transaction” means the November 2018 transaction whereby Retail Capital acquired 51% (fifty one percent) of the issued share capital of FAF; and

2.10. “Tribunal” means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal place of business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the DTI Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

3.

BACKGROUND TO THIS CONSENT AGREEMENT

3.1 On 19 July 2019 the Commission received a notification of an intermediate merger transaction, which was filed by Retail Capital and FAF. The primary acquiring firm was Retail Capital and the primary target firm was FAF. Prior to the Transaction, Retail Capital did not directly or indirectly hold any shareholding or exercise any control over FAF.

3.2 The Transaction resulted in Retail Capital acquiring sole control of FAF in terms of the Act.

3.3 In the merger filing, the Merging Parties indicated that the Transaction had been implemented in November 2018. The Commission evaluated the Transaction and found that it was unlikely to result in the substantial lessening and/ or prevention of competition in any market, that it was unlikely to negatively impact on employment, and that it did not raise any public interest concerns. The Transaction was accordingly approved without any conditions and the Commission issued the merger clearance certificate on 13 August 2019. The issue of prior implementation, to which this Consent Agreement relates, was dealt with separately.

4. COMMISSION’S INVESTIGATION AND FINDINGS

4.1 Retail Capital did not directly or indirectly hold any shareholding or exercise any control over FAF prior to the Transaction. In terms of the Transaction, Retail Capital purchased the claims each seller held against FAF and acquired 51% (fifty one percent) of FAF’s entire issued share capital in the form of 471, 750 ordinary no par value shares in FAF’s issued share capital.

4.2 The Transaction was implemented in November 2018. The Merging Parties voluntarily informed the Commission of their bona fide prior implementation error in May 2019 and notified the Commission of the Transaction in July 2019, nine months after the transaction was implemented. This conduct by the Merging Parties is in contravention of 13A(3) of the Act, which stipulates that parties to an intermediate merger may not implement that merger until it has been approved, with or without conditions, by the Commission in terms of section 14(1)(b).

5.

ADMISSION OF LIABILITY

The Respondents admit that they contravened section 13A(3) of the Act by implementing the Transaction prior to the approval of the Transaction by the Commission.

6.

FUTURE CONDUCT

6.1 The Respondents agree and undertake to notify the Commission of any future transactions that constitute a notifiable merger as defined in section 12(1) of the Act read together with section 11(5) of the Act. The Respondents furthermore agree and undertake to refrain from engaging in prior implementation of notifiable mergers in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act.

6.2 The Respondents also agree and undertake to develop and implement a competition law compliance programme as part of its corporate governance policy, which is designed to ensure that its employees, management, directors and agents do not engage in future contraventions of Chapter 3 of the Act. In particular, such compliance programme will include mechanisms for the identification, prevention, detection and monitoring of any contravention of the Act.

6.3 The Respondents furthermore agree and undertake to submit a copy of such compliance programme to the Commission within 60 days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order by the Tribunal.

7.

ADMINISTRATIVE PENALTY

7.1 Having regard to the provisions of section 59(1)(d), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Retail Capital accepts that it is liable to pay an administrative penalty, which is not more than 10% of its annual turnover in the Republic and its exports from the Republic during the preceding financial year.

7.2 The Merging Parties have agreed that Retail Capital will pay an administrative penalty in the total amount of R742 500 (seven hundred and forty-two thousand and five hundred Rand), payable in 10 (ten) equal monthly instalments of R74 250 (seventy-four thousand, two hundred and fifty Rand). The first instalment shall payable within 30 days from the date of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

7.3 The administrative penalty will accrue interest in terms of the provisions of section 80(1) of the Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999 for any amounts not paid within a year from the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement by the Tribunal.

7.4 The penalty and such interest as may become payable in terms of 7.3 above, must be paid into the Commission’s bank account which is as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: ABS COMM

PUBL NR

Account holder: The Competition Commission

Account number: [....]

Account type: Current

Account Branch Code: 638056

Reference: 2019Jul0038/ Retail Capital and FAF

7.5 The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

8.

FULL AND FINAL SETTLEMENT

This Consent Agreement, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, is entered into in full and final settlement and concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the Respondents relating to the contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act by the Respondents

that were the subject of the Commission's investigation under CC case number: 2019Jul0038.

Tembinkosi Bonakele

The Commissioner: Competition Commission

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Public Finance Management Act 1 of 1999

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.