Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Sanitech a division of Waco Africa (Pty) Ltd (CO047Jun20) [2020] ZACT 65 (2 June 2020)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal finds that the consent agreement entered into between the Competition Commission and Sanitech is in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act and serves the public interest. There is no opposition to the confirmation of the agreement, and the Tribunal is satisfied that the terms are appropriate. Accordingly, the consent agreement is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Sanitech- A Division of Waco Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

Sanitech- A Division of Waco Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order / Final

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Whether the consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Sanitech should be confirmed by the Tribunal.

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission submits that the consent agreement reached with Sanitech addresses the alleged contraventions of the Competition Act and is in the public interest. The Commission requests the Tribunal to confirm the agreement as an order.
Respondent
Sanitech agrees to the terms of the consent agreement as negotiated with the Competition Commission and does not oppose its confirmation by the Tribunal.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Section 49D of the Competition Act, 89 of 1998

    The Tribunal may confirm a consent agreement entered into between the Commission and a respondent if it is just and in the public interest.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal finds that the consent agreement entered into between the Competition Commission and Sanitech is in accordance with the provisions of the Competition Act and serves the public interest. There is no opposition to the confirmation of the agreement, and the Tribunal is satisfied that the terms are appropriate. Accordingly, the consent agreement is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Sanitech- A Division of Waco Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2020] ZACT 65

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: CO047Jun20

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission Applicant

And

Sanitech- A Division of Waco Africa (Pty) Ltd Respondent

Panel: Enver Daniels (Presiding Member) Andiswa Ndoni (Tribunal Member) AW Wessels (Tribunal Member)

Considered in chambers on: 2 July 2020

Decided on: 2 July 2020

Consent Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the consent agreement as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and Sanitech- A Division of Waco Africa (Pty) ltd hereto attached as 'Annexure A'

Enver Daniels Presiding Member

Concurring: Mr AW Wessels and Ms A Ndoni

Date: 2 July 2022

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.