Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd (96/CR/Nov11) [2012] ZACT 9 (1 February 2012)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in horizontal price fixing with competitors, as detailed in the Commission's investigation. The conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The parties agreed to a consent agreement, including an administrative penalty of R959,000, cooperation undertakings, and the implementation of a compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement complied with the requirements of the Act and confirmed it as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA relating to the investigated conduct.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA concluded.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R959,000 to the Competition Commission within seven days of confirmation of this order.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Competition Commission in relation to prosecution of the conduct described in the consent agreement.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall implement a compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 business days.
  • All proceedings between the Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd relating to the investigated conduct are concluded.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty: ZAR 959,000
  • Penalty Percentage of 2007 Turnover: 5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd, together with other freight forwarders, participated in discussions and agreements to fix the level of various surcharges and accessorial fees in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The Commission submitted that Schenker SA benefited from this conduct and that an administrative penalty of R959,000, constituting 5% of relevant turnover in 2007, was appropriate. The Commission requested confirmation of the consent agreement and outlined future cooperation and compliance undertakings by Schenker SA.
Respondent
Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to the conduct described by the Commission, acknowledged the contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i), and agreed to pay the administrative penalty. Schenker SA undertook to cooperate with the Commission in future proceedings, refrain from further contraventions, and implement a compliance programme to prevent recurrence. The respondent requested that the consent agreement be confirmed as a final settlement of all related proceedings.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

    Section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act prohibits agreements between competitors to fix prices or trading conditions.

  2. 02

    Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

    Section 58(1)(a)(iii) empowers the Tribunal to confirm consent agreements as orders.

  3. 03

    Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

    Section 59(1)(a) provides for the imposition of administrative penalties for contraventions of the Act.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd admitted to participating in horizontal price fixing with competitors, as detailed in the Commission's investigation. The conduct contravened section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Competition Act. The parties agreed to a consent agreement, including an administrative penalty of R959,000, cooperation undertakings, and the implementation of a compliance programme. The Tribunal was satisfied that the consent agreement complied with the requirements of the Act and confirmed it as an order, thereby concluding all proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA relating to the investigated conduct.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of compliance programmes in preventing future contraventions of competition law.
  • The cooperation of Schenker SA with the Commission in ongoing investigations was acknowledged as a positive step towards enforcement of the Act.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal; administrative penalty imposed; proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA concluded.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall pay an administrative penalty of R959,000 to the Competition Commission within seven days of confirmation of this order.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall cooperate with the Competition Commission in relation to prosecution of the conduct described in the consent agreement.
  • Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd shall implement a compliance programme and submit a copy to the Commission within 90 business days.
  • All proceedings between the Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd relating to the investigated conduct are concluded.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2012] ZACT 9

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH

AFRICA

Case No.:96/CR/Nov11

In the matter between:

THE COMPETITION COMMISSION …......................................................................

APPLICANT

And

SCHENKER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD …..............................................RESPONDENT

Panel A Wessels (Presiding Member), A Ndoni (Tribunal Member) and M Mokuena (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 18 January 2012

Order issued on : 01 February 2012

ORDER

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondent, annexed hereto marked "A".

Presiding Member

A. wessels

Concurring: A Ndoni and M Mokuena

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OP SOUTH AFRICA

CC Case No. 2007OCT3236

CT 96/CR/NOV11

In the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION

and

SCHENKER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD

CONSENT AGREEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 49D READ WITH SECTION 58(1)(a)(iii) AS READ WITH SECTION 58(1)(b) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 1998 (ACT NO. 89 OF 1998), AS AMENDED, BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND SCHENKER SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LIMITED,

IN REGARD ALLEGED CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 4(1)(b)(i) OF THE

The Competition Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd hereby agree that application be made to the Competition Tribunal for the confirmation of a Consent Agreement in terms of section 58 (1)(a)(Hi) as read with sections 58(1 )(b) and 59(1 )(a) of the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended, on the terms set out below:

Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shaif apply:

1.1. "Act means the Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998), as amended;

1.2. "BAX Global" means Bax Global Ltd which included the BAX group of comoanies that became affiliated to Schenker SA in January 2006. ySKK\ Global Ltd was acquired on 1 January 2006 by Deutsche Bahn AG, the holding company of Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd.

1.3. 'Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at 1st Floor, Mulayo Building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjies Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng;

1.4. “Commissioner" means the Commissioner of the Competition Commission, appointed in terms of section 22 of the Act;

1.5. "Complaint' means the complaint initiated by the Commissioner of the Competition Commission in terms of section 49B of the Act under case number

2007OCT3236;

1.6. "Consent Agreement" means this agreement duly signed and concluded between the Commission and Schenker South Africa (Pty) Limited;

1.7. "Schenker SA" means Schenker South Africa (Pty) Limited, a company registered and incorporated in accordance with the laws of the Republic of South-Africa with registration number 1962/003897/07 and with its registered address, alternatively principal place of business at Freight City, 24 Pamona Road, Pamona, Kempton Park, South-Africa;

1.8. "Parties" means the Commission and Schenker SA;

1.9. "Respondents" means the firms subject to the Commission's investigation of the complaint initiated under case number 2007Oct3236, namely Schenker South Africa (Pty)Ltd, Schenker AG Group, Deutsche Bahn AG, Kuehne+Nagel (Pty) Ltd, Kuehne+Nagel Group, Kuehne+Nagel International AG, Expediters international South Africa (Pty) Ltd, Expeditors International, Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, UTI South Africa (Pty) Ltd, UTI Worldwide Inc., DHL International (Pty) Ltd, DHL Global Forwarding, DHL International GmbH, Deutsche Post AG, BAX Global Inc., Dascher, Eagle Air Freight Inc., Emery Air Freight Corporation, Geologistics Corporation, Mane Freight, Saima and SAAFF.

1.10. "tribunal' means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory^bony established in terms of section 26 of the Act, with its principal piac® of) business at 3rd Floor, Mulayo building (Block C), the dti Campus, 77 Meintjtes Street, Sunnyside, Pretoria, Gauteng.

2. The Complaint and Complaint investigation

2.1. On 2 October 2007 the Commissioner initiated a complaint against Bax, Dascher, Eagle, Emery, Expediters, Geologtstics, Kuehne & Nagel, Mane Freight, Panaipina, Saima, Schenker and UTI in respect of allegations that the respondents, being parties in a horizontal relationship in the provision of freight forwarding services, may have contravened sections 4(1)(a), 4(1}(b)(i) and/or 4(1)(b)(ii) of the Act in that they discussed and agreed to fix the level of various surcharges and accessorial fees.

2.2. The Commission's investigation found, amongst others, that:

2.2.1 United Kingdom Air New Export System Security ("NES"):

During the period October 2002 to around 2005 various freight forwarders including BAX Global Ltd in the United Kingdom participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called NES fee for shipments by air originating in the United Kingdom. The NES fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the United Kingdom's customs authorities for shipments leaving the United Kingdom.

2.2.2. Air Automated Manifest System ("AMS") fee from Germany:

During July 2004 freight forwarders including Schenker Deutschland AG, (a company affiliated to Schenker SA) in Germany participated in discussions aimed at achieving the introduction of a so called AMS fee for shipments by air to the US originating in Germany. Discussions also related to the approximate level of the AMS fee. The AMS fee was to be applied in connection with costs arising

through the application of a pre-clearance system introduced by the US customs authorities for shipments to the US.

2.2.3 Chinese air Currency Adjustment Factor ("CAP}:

During the period July 2005 to March 2006, freight forwarders including Schenker China Ltd. and BAX Global (China) Co. Ltd. in China agree with competitors on the introduction of a currency adjustment factor or CAF of 2.1% for shipments by air originating in China. The CAF was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the losses incurred following a change in the value ratio of the US dollar to the Chinese renmimbi.

2.2.4 Hong Kong air Peak Season Surchage {"PSS"):

During the period August 2005 to May 2007 various freight forwarders inciuding Schenker International (H.K.) Ltd and BAX Global Limited (Hong Kong) in Hong Kong participated in discussions aimed at exchanging information, such as start and end dates and approximate amounts, regarding the introduction of a peak season surcharge or PSS for shipments by air originating in Hong Kong, Macau and south China. The PSS was designed to compensate freight forwarders for the rate increases imposed upon them by the air carriers during busy periods for air cargo shipments.

2.3 In light of its findings, the Commission took a decision to refer its findings of conduct in contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) to the Tribunal for adjudication.

3. Statement of conduct by Schenker SA

Schenker SA acknowledges that the conduct described above constitutes a contravention of section 4(1)(b)(i) of the Act and admits that if benefitted from such conduct.

4. Administrative Penalty

4.1 In accordance with the provisions of section 58(1)(a)(iii) as read with sections 59(1 )(a), 59(2) and 59(3) of the Act, Schenker SA is liable for and has agreed to pay an administrative penalty in the amount of R959 000,00 (nine hundred and fifty nine

thousand Rand), which amounts constitutes 5% of the relevant turnover in 2007.

4.2 Schenker SA will pay the amount set out in paragraph 4.3 above to the Commission within seven days of the date of confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal,

4.3 This payment shall be made into the Commission's bank account, details of which are as follows:

Bank name: Absa Bank Branch name: Pretoria Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account Account number: 4050778576 Account type: Current Account Branch Code: 323 345 4.4 The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

5. Agreement Concerning Future Conduct 5.1 Schenker SA agrees to cooperate with the Commission in relation to theprosecution of the. conduct described in this Consent Agreement. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, Schenker SA specifically agrees to: Provide witnesses to testify in the complaint referral (if any) in respect of alleged contraventions covered by this Consent Agreement; and

To the extent that it is in existence, and has not already been provided to the Commission, provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Consent Agreement. Schenker SA agrees that it will refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1 )(b) of the Act.

Schenker SA undertakes to develop and implement a compliance programme, with corporate governance, designed to ensure that all its relevant employees are aware of the provisions of the Competition Act and do not contravene them; and to submit a copy of the aforementioned compliance programme outlined above to the Commission within 90 business days of the date of confirmation of this Consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6. Full and Final Settlement This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA and its affiliates relating to any alleged contravention of the Act that is the subject of the Commission's investigation under Case No. 2007Oct 3236. Dated and signed at Pomana on the 23 day of January 2012 Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd For the Commission Competition Commissioner

Bank name: Absa Bank

Branch name: Pretoria

Account holder: Competition Commission Fees Account

Account number: 4050778576

Account type: Current Account

Branch Code: 323 345

4.4 The penalty will be paid over by the Commission to the National Revenue Fund in accordance with section 59(4) of the Act.

5. Agreement Concerning Future Conduct

5.1 Schenker SA agrees to cooperate with the Commission in relation to theprosecution of the. conduct described in this Consent Agreement. Withoutlimiting the generality of the foregoing, Schenker SA specifically agrees to:

Provide witnesses to testify in the complaint referral (if any) in respect of alleged contraventions covered by this Consent Agreement; and

To the extent that it is in existence, and has not already been provided to the Commission, provide evidence, written or otherwise, which is in its possession or under its control, concerning the alleged contraventions contained in this Consent Agreement.

Schenker SA agrees that it will refrain from any conduct that may contravene section 4(1 )(b) of the Act.

Schenker SA undertakes to develop and implement a compliance programme, with corporate governance, designed to ensure that all its relevant employees are aware of the provisions of the Competition Act and do not contravene them; and to submit a copy of the aforementioned compliance programme outlined above to the Commission within 90 business days of the date of confirmation of this Consent agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

6. Full and Final Settlement

This agreement is entered into in full and final settlement and, upon confirmation as an order by the Tribunal, concludes all proceedings between the Commission and Schenker SA and its affiliates relating to any alleged contravention of the Act that is the subject of the Commission's investigation under Case No. 2007Oct 3236.

Dated and signed at Pomana on the 23 day of January 2012

Schenker South Africa (Pty) Ltd

For the Commission

Competition Commissioner

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, 1998 (Act No. 89 of 1998)

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.