Download PDF

South Africa Order

Competition Tribunal

Competition Commission v WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd and Another (69/AM/Oct10) [2010] ZACT 77 (10 November 2010)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal confirmed that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction implemented an intermediate merger without prior notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. Both parties admitted the contravention and accepted liability for administrative penalties. The Tribunal accepted the consent agreement, which included undertakings to refrain from future contraventions and to continue compliance programmes. The penalties imposed were R1,000,000 for WBHO and R100,000 for Edwin, payable within seven days of confirmation. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding this contravention.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalties imposed and compliance undertakings accepted.

Orders

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission, WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd, and Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R1,000,000 within seven days.
  • Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R100,000 within seven days.
  • Proof of payment must be provided to the Commission.
  • The Commission will pay over the penalty amounts to the National Revenue Fund.
  • The respondents must refrain from prior implementation of notifiable mergers and continue their compliance programme.
  • This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding the contravention.

02

Material facts

Parties

Competition Commission

Applicant

WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Administrative Penalty (wbho Construction): ZAR 1,000,000
  • Administrative Penalty (edwin Construction): ZAR 100,000

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The Competition Commission argued that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction concluded two transactions resulting in WBHO acquiring control over Edwin. Both transactions constituted a notifiable intermediate merger under the Competition Act. The respondents failed to notify and obtain approval prior to implementation, contravening section 13A(3). The Commission sought confirmation of a consent agreement imposing administrative penalties and compliance undertakings.
Respondent
The respondents admitted that the transactions constituted a notifiable intermediate merger and acknowledged that they implemented the merger prior to notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3). They accepted responsibility for notification and agreed to pay administrative penalties and to refrain from future contraventions, continuing their compliance programme.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 12(1), 11(5)(b), 13A

    A merger that results in a change of control must be notified to the Competition Commission prior to implementation if it meets the thresholds for an intermediate merger.

  2. 02

    Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 13A(3), 58(1)(a)(iii), 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2), 59(3)

    Implementing a notifiable merger without prior approval constitutes a contravention and renders the parties liable for administrative penalties.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal confirmed that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction implemented an intermediate merger without prior notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. Both parties admitted the contravention and accepted liability for administrative penalties. The Tribunal accepted the consent agreement, which included undertakings to refrain from future contraventions and to continue compliance programmes. The penalties imposed were R1,000,000 for WBHO and R100,000 for Edwin, payable within seven days of confirmation. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding this contravention.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the importance of merger notification and compliance with the Competition Act to ensure effective regulation of market concentration.
  • The respondents' prompt cooperation and implementation of compliance measures were considered in the determination of the penalty.

Court disposition

Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalties imposed and compliance undertakings accepted.

  • The consent agreement between the Competition Commission, WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd, and Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
  • WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R1,000,000 within seven days.
  • Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R100,000 within seven days.
  • Proof of payment must be provided to the Commission.
  • The Commission will pay over the penalty amounts to the National Revenue Fund.
  • The respondents must refrain from prior implementation of notifiable mergers and continue their compliance programme.
  • This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding the contravention.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Order

[2010] ZACT 77

COMPETITION

TRIBUNAL

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case No:69/AM/Oct10

In the matter between:

The Competition Commission …......................................................................................Applicant

and

WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd …............................................................................1st Respondent

Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd ….............................................................................2nd Respondent

Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), A Wessels (Tribunal Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)

Heard on 10 November 2010

Decided on : 10 November 2010

Order

The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondents, annexed hereto marked "A".

Presiding Member

N Manoim

Concurring: A Wessels and Y Carrim

IN

THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA

In the matter between:

THE

COMPETITION COMMISSION …...........................................................APPLICANT

And

WBHO CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …...................1st

RESPONDENT

EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …................2nd

RESPONDENT

CONSENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND WBHOCONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED AND EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED IN REGARD TO A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 13A OF

THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998 (AS AMENDED) The Competition Commission and WBHO Construction (Proprietary) Limited and Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of Sections 49D as read with Sections 58(1)(b) and 59(1)(d)(t) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended, on the terms set out below:

CONSENT

AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND WBHOCONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED AND EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED IN REGARD TO A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 13A OF

THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998 (AS AMENDED)

The Competition Commission and WBHO Construction (Proprietary) Limited and Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of Sections 49D as read with Sections 58(1)(b) and 59(1)(d)(t) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended, on the terms set out below:

1. Definitions For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply: 1.1 "Ac? means the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (as amended). 1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at Building C, Mulayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng. 1.3. "Tribunaf means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 26 of the Act with its principal

place of business at Building C, Muiayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng. 1.4. "Consent Agreement means this written consent agreement duly signed by the Commission, WBHO and Edwin. 1.5. WBHO- means-WBHO Constraotion (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. WBHO is ultimately controlled by Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Limited, a public company listed on the JSE Limited. 1.6. "Edwin" means Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. Edwin is as at the date of signature of this Consent Agreement controlled by WBHO. 1.7. "Respondents" means Edwin and WBHO collectively.

2. Background facts 2.1. The First Transaction 2.1.1. On 2 June 2005, a shareholders' agreement was entered into between WBHO and Mr Edwin Maila (a shareholder of Edwin) to regulate and govern their relationship as shareholders of Edwin. The shareholders agreement formed part of a transaction in terms of which WBHO acquired 49% of the issued share capital of Edwin for R49 ("the First Transaction"). In terms of the shareholders agreement, WBHO obtained the right to appoint the majority of the directors of Edwin and accordingly in terms of Section 12(2)(c) of the Act acquired sole, de jura control over Edwin as a result of the First Transaction. 2.1.2. The First Transaction was not notified to the Commission as required by the provisions of section 13A of the Act. The Respondents implemented the First Transaction immediately after the conclusion of the shareholders agreement. 2.2. The Second Transaction 2.2.1. During May 2008, WBHO and Mr Maila concluded heads of agreement for, inter alia, thetransfer of a further 8% of the shares in Edwin to WBHO, increasing WBHO shareholding from 49% to 57% of the issued share capital of Edwin ("the Second Transaction"). 2.2.2. The Respondents implemented the Second Transaction after the conclusion of heads of agreement : " 2.2.3. The First and Second Transaction shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Transaction". 2.2.4 Failure

to notify the Transaction only came to the attention of the Respondents when the auditors BDO Spencer Steward Inc ("BDO") were auditing WBHO's financial statements for the financial year ending 30 June 2009. BDO raised the question as to whether the acquisition of control by WBHO over Edwin had been notified to the Commission. 2.2.5. WBHO advised the Commission that immediately upon receiving the query from BDO it contacted its legal advisors, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc ("CDH"), to check whether the Transaction required compulsory notification to the Commission. CDH confirmed that the Transaction required notification and was instructed by WBHO to bring this fact to the attention of the Commission and to resolve the issue as soon as possible. 2.2.6. The Commission met with CDH and a representative of WBHO on 28 July 2009, and advised the parties to notify the Transaction as soon as possible and to provide factual background to the failure to notify. 2.2.7. The Transaction was notified to the Commission on 18 August 2009 as an intermediate merger, which was approved by the Commission 29 September 2009, under case number: 2009Aug4617.

3. Commission's investigation and findings 3.1 The Commission investigated the alleged contravention and found the following: 3.1.1. The Transaction resulted in the change of Edwin's control, which change of control constituted a merger in terms of section 12(1) of the Act. 3.1.2. Further, the Commission found that the threshold for an intermediate merger as defined in section 11 (5)(b) as read with section 11 (1) of the Act and Notice 253 of 2001 was met in respect of the Transaction. 3.1.3. Further, the Commission found that the merging parties implemented the merger prior to the notification of and approval by the Commission in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act.

4. Admissions 4.1. The Respondents admit that the Transaction constituted a notifiable intermediate merger as defined in Section 11(5)(b) of the Act 4.2. The Respondents further admit that the merger was implemented prior to notification and approval of the Commission in contravention of Section 13A(3) of the Act. 4.3. The Respondents further admit that both WBHO and Edwin were responsible for notifying the Commission of the Transaction.

5. Compliance with the Act The Respondents agree and undertake to: 5.1. refrain from engaging in prior implementation of notifiable mergers in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act; and 5.2 continue to implement the existing compliance programme already adopted by the Respondents.

6. Administrative penalty The Respondents admit that they are each liable to pay an administrative penalty in terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) read with section 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2) and (3) of the Act

WBHO agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R1 000 000 (One Million Rand), and Edwin agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R100 000 (One Hundred Thousand Rand). Each penalty shall be payable within 7 (seven) days of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal. The administrative penalty is payable into the bank account of the Commission whose, banking details are: Bank: ABSA Bank Name of account: Competition Commission Account Number 4050778576 Branch Code: 323345 6.5. Proof of payment of the administrative penalty amounts will emailed to the Commission marked for the attention of the Manager of Mergers & Acquisitions. 6.6. The Commission will pay over the penalty amount to the National Revenue Fund referred to in section 59(4) of the Act.

7. Full and final settlement This Consent Agreement, upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal, concludes al! proceedings between the Commission and the Respondents in relation to the contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act, investigated under the Commission's case number: 2009Aug4617.

1. Definitions

For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply:

1.1 "Ac? means the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (as amended).

1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 19 of the Act, with its principal

place of business at Building C, Mulayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng.

1.3. "Tribunaf means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 26 of the Act with its principal

place of business at Building C, Muiayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng.

1.4. "Consent Agreement means this written consent agreement duly signed by the Commission, WBHO and Edwin.

1.5. WBHO- means-WBHO Constraotion (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. WBHO is ultimately controlled by Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Limited, a public company listed on the JSE Limited.

1.6. "Edwin" means Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. Edwin is as at the date of signature of this Consent Agreement controlled by WBHO.

1.7. "Respondents" means Edwin and WBHO collectively.

2. Background facts

2.1. The First Transaction

2.1.1. On 2 June 2005, a shareholders' agreement was entered into between WBHO and Mr Edwin Maila (a shareholder of Edwin) to regulate and govern their relationship as shareholders of Edwin. The shareholders agreement formed part of a transaction in terms of which WBHO acquired 49% of the issued share capital of Edwin for R49 ("the First Transaction"). In terms of the shareholders agreement, WBHO obtained the right to appoint the majority of the directors of Edwin and accordingly in terms of Section 12(2)(c) of the Act acquired sole, de jura control over Edwin as a result of the First Transaction.

2.1.2. The First Transaction was not notified to the Commission as required by the provisions of section 13A of the Act. The Respondents implemented the First Transaction immediately after the conclusion of the shareholders agreement.

2.2. The Second Transaction

2.2.1. During May 2008, WBHO and Mr Maila concluded heads of agreement for, inter alia, thetransfer of a further 8% of the shares in Edwin to WBHO, increasing WBHO shareholding from 49% to 57% of the issued share capital of Edwin ("the Second Transaction").

2.2.2. The Respondents implemented the Second Transaction after the conclusion of heads of agreement : "

2.2.3. The First and Second Transaction shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Transaction".

2.2.4 Failure to notify the Transaction only came to the attention of the Respondents when the auditors BDO Spencer Steward Inc ("BDO") were auditing WBHO's financial statements for the financial year ending 30 June 2009. BDO raised the question as to whether the acquisition of control by WBHO over Edwin had been notified to the Commission.

2.2.5. WBHO advised the Commission that immediately upon receiving the query from BDO it contacted its legal advisors, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc ("CDH"), to check whether the Transaction required compulsory notification to the Commission. CDH confirmed that the Transaction required notification and was instructed by WBHO to bring this fact to the attention of the Commission and to resolve the issue as soon as possible.

2.2.6. The Commission met with CDH and a representative of WBHO on 28 July 2009, and advised the parties to notify the Transaction as soon as possible and to provide factual background to the failure to notify.

2.2.7. The Transaction was notified to the Commission on 18 August 2009 as an intermediate merger, which was approved by the Commission 29 September 2009, under case number: 2009Aug4617.

3. Commission's investigation and findings

3.1 The Commission investigated the alleged contravention and found the following:

3.1.1. The Transaction resulted in the change of Edwin's control, which change of control constituted a merger in terms of section 12(1) of the Act.

3.1.2. Further, the Commission found that the threshold for an intermediate merger as defined in section 11 (5)(b) as read with section 11 (1) of the Act and Notice 253 of 2001 was met in respect of the Transaction.

3.1.3. Further, the Commission found that the merging parties implemented the merger prior to the notification of and approval by the Commission in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act.

4. Admissions

4.1. The Respondents admit that the Transaction constituted a notifiable intermediate merger as defined in Section 11(5)(b) of the Act

4.2. The Respondents further admit that the merger was implemented prior to notification and approval of the Commission in contravention of Section 13A(3) of the Act.

4.3. The Respondents further admit that both WBHO and Edwin were responsible for notifying the Commission of the Transaction.

5. Compliance with the Act

The Respondents agree and undertake to:

5.1. refrain from engaging in prior implementation of notifiable mergers in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act; and

5.2 continue to implement the existing compliance programme already adopted by the Respondents.

6. Administrative penalty

The Respondents admit that they are each liable to pay an administrative penalty in terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) read with section 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2) and (3) of the Act

WBHO agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R1 000 000 (One Million Rand), and Edwin agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R100 000 (One Hundred Thousand Rand).

Each penalty shall be payable within 7 (seven) days of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.

The administrative penalty is payable into the bank account of the Commission whose, banking details are:

Bank: ABSA Bank

Name of account: Competition Commission

Account Number 4050778576

Branch Code: 323345

6.5. Proof of payment of the administrative penalty amounts will emailed to the Commission marked for the attention of the Manager of Mergers & Acquisitions.

6.6. The Commission will pay over the penalty amount to the National Revenue Fund referred to in section 59(4) of the Act.

7. Full and final settlement

This Consent Agreement, upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal, concludes al! proceedings between the Commission and the Respondents in relation to the contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act, investigated under the Commission's case number: 2009Aug4617.

Date and signed at Sandtonon this the 18th day of October 2010

WHBO Construction (Prorietary) Limited

Date and signed at Sandtonon this the 19th day of October 2010

Edwin Construction (Prorietary) Limited

Date and signed at Pretoria on this the 26th day of October 2010

Competition Commission

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Notice 253 of 2001

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.