Competition Commission v WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd and Another (69/AM/Oct10) [2010] ZACT 77 (10 November 2010)
- Citation
- [2010] ZACT 77
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, A Wessels, Y Carrim
- Case number
- 69/AM/Oct10
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- N Manoim, A Wessels, Y Carrim
- Case number
- 69/AM/Oct10
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal confirmed that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction implemented an intermediate merger without prior notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. Both parties admitted the contravention and accepted liability for administrative penalties. The Tribunal accepted the consent agreement, which included undertakings to refrain from future contraventions and to continue compliance programmes. The penalties imposed were R1,000,000 for WBHO and R100,000 for Edwin, payable within seven days of confirmation. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding this contravention.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalties imposed and compliance undertakings accepted.
Orders
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission, WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd, and Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R1,000,000 within seven days.
- Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R100,000 within seven days.
- Proof of payment must be provided to the Commission.
- The Commission will pay over the penalty amounts to the National Revenue Fund.
- The respondents must refrain from prior implementation of notifiable mergers and continue their compliance programme.
- This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding the contravention.
02
Material facts
Parties
Competition Commission
ApplicantWBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd
RespondentEdwin Construction (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Administrative Penalty (wbho Construction): ZAR 1,000,000
- Administrative Penalty (edwin Construction): ZAR 100,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Consent Order Application / Order Confirming Consent Agreement
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Did the respondents implement a notifiable intermediate merger without prior notification and approval by the Competition Commission, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act?
- 02
Are the respondents liable to pay an administrative penalty for the contravention?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Competition Commission argued that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction concluded two transactions resulting in WBHO acquiring control over Edwin. Both transactions constituted a notifiable intermediate merger under the Competition Act. The respondents failed to notify and obtain approval prior to implementation, contravening section 13A(3). The Commission sought confirmation of a consent agreement imposing administrative penalties and compliance undertakings.
- Respondent
- The respondents admitted that the transactions constituted a notifiable intermediate merger and acknowledged that they implemented the merger prior to notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3). They accepted responsibility for notification and agreed to pay administrative penalties and to refrain from future contraventions, continuing their compliance programme.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 12(1), 11(5)(b), 13A
A merger that results in a change of control must be notified to the Competition Commission prior to implementation if it meets the thresholds for an intermediate merger.
- 02
Competition Act 89 of 1998, sections 13A(3), 58(1)(a)(iii), 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2), 59(3)
Implementing a notifiable merger without prior approval constitutes a contravention and renders the parties liable for administrative penalties.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal confirmed that WBHO Construction and Edwin Construction implemented an intermediate merger without prior notification and approval, in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Competition Act. Both parties admitted the contravention and accepted liability for administrative penalties. The Tribunal accepted the consent agreement, which included undertakings to refrain from future contraventions and to continue compliance programmes. The penalties imposed were R1,000,000 for WBHO and R100,000 for Edwin, payable within seven days of confirmation. The order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding this contravention.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted the importance of merger notification and compliance with the Competition Act to ensure effective regulation of market concentration.
- The respondents' prompt cooperation and implementation of compliance measures were considered in the determination of the penalty.
Court disposition
Consent agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal. Administrative penalties imposed and compliance undertakings accepted.
- The consent agreement between the Competition Commission, WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd, and Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R1,000,000 within seven days.
- Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd must pay an administrative penalty of R100,000 within seven days.
- Proof of payment must be provided to the Commission.
- The Commission will pay over the penalty amounts to the National Revenue Fund.
- The respondents must refrain from prior implementation of notifiable mergers and continue their compliance programme.
- This order concludes all proceedings between the Commission and the respondents regarding the contravention.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Order
COMPETITION
TRIBUNAL
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case No:69/AM/Oct10
In the matter between:
The Competition Commission …......................................................................................Applicant
and
WBHO Construction (Pty) Ltd …............................................................................1st Respondent
Edwin Construction (Pty) Ltd ….............................................................................2nd Respondent
Panel : N Manoim (Presiding Member), A Wessels (Tribunal Member) and Y Carrim (Tribunal Member)
Heard on 10 November 2010
Decided on : 10 November 2010
Order
The Tribunal hereby confirms the order as agreed to and proposed by the Competition Commission and the respondents, annexed hereto marked "A".
Presiding Member
N Manoim
Concurring: A Wessels and Y Carrim
IN
THE COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF SOUTH AFRICA
In the matter between:
THE
COMPETITION COMMISSION …...........................................................APPLICANT
And
WBHO CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …...................1st
RESPONDENT
EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED …................2nd
RESPONDENT
CONSENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND WBHOCONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED AND EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED IN REGARD TO A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 13A OF
THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998 (AS AMENDED) The Competition Commission and WBHO Construction (Proprietary) Limited and Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of Sections 49D as read with Sections 58(1)(b) and 59(1)(d)(t) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended, on the terms set out below:
CONSENT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COMPETITION COMMISSION AND WBHOCONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED AND EDWIN CONSTRUCTION (PROPRIETARY) LIMITED IN REGARD TO A CONTRAVENTION OF SECTION 13A OF
THE COMPETITION ACT 89 OF 1998 (AS AMENDED)
The Competition Commission and WBHO Construction (Proprietary) Limited and Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited hereby agree that an application be made to the Competition Tribunal for confirmation of the Consent Agreement as an order of the Competition Tribunal in terms of Sections 49D as read with Sections 58(1)(b) and 59(1)(d)(t) of the Competition Act 89 of 1998, as amended, on the terms set out below:
1. Definitions For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply: 1.1 "Ac? means the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (as amended). 1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 19 of the Act, with its principal
place of business at Building C, Mulayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng. 1.3. "Tribunaf means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 26 of the Act with its principal
place of business at Building C, Muiayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng. 1.4. "Consent Agreement means this written consent agreement duly signed by the Commission, WBHO and Edwin. 1.5. WBHO- means-WBHO Constraotion (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. WBHO is ultimately controlled by Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Limited, a public company listed on the JSE Limited. 1.6. "Edwin" means Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. Edwin is as at the date of signature of this Consent Agreement controlled by WBHO. 1.7. "Respondents" means Edwin and WBHO collectively.
2. Background facts 2.1. The First Transaction 2.1.1. On 2 June 2005, a shareholders' agreement was entered into between WBHO and Mr Edwin Maila (a shareholder of Edwin) to regulate and govern their relationship as shareholders of Edwin. The shareholders agreement formed part of a transaction in terms of which WBHO acquired 49% of the issued share capital of Edwin for R49 ("the First Transaction"). In terms of the shareholders agreement, WBHO obtained the right to appoint the majority of the directors of Edwin and accordingly in terms of Section 12(2)(c) of the Act acquired sole, de jura control over Edwin as a result of the First Transaction. 2.1.2. The First Transaction was not notified to the Commission as required by the provisions of section 13A of the Act. The Respondents implemented the First Transaction immediately after the conclusion of the shareholders agreement. 2.2. The Second Transaction 2.2.1. During May 2008, WBHO and Mr Maila concluded heads of agreement for, inter alia, thetransfer of a further 8% of the shares in Edwin to WBHO, increasing WBHO shareholding from 49% to 57% of the issued share capital of Edwin ("the Second Transaction"). 2.2.2. The Respondents implemented the Second Transaction after the conclusion of heads of agreement : " 2.2.3. The First and Second Transaction shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Transaction". 2.2.4 Failure
to notify the Transaction only came to the attention of the Respondents when the auditors BDO Spencer Steward Inc ("BDO") were auditing WBHO's financial statements for the financial year ending 30 June 2009. BDO raised the question as to whether the acquisition of control by WBHO over Edwin had been notified to the Commission. 2.2.5. WBHO advised the Commission that immediately upon receiving the query from BDO it contacted its legal advisors, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc ("CDH"), to check whether the Transaction required compulsory notification to the Commission. CDH confirmed that the Transaction required notification and was instructed by WBHO to bring this fact to the attention of the Commission and to resolve the issue as soon as possible. 2.2.6. The Commission met with CDH and a representative of WBHO on 28 July 2009, and advised the parties to notify the Transaction as soon as possible and to provide factual background to the failure to notify. 2.2.7. The Transaction was notified to the Commission on 18 August 2009 as an intermediate merger, which was approved by the Commission 29 September 2009, under case number: 2009Aug4617.
3. Commission's investigation and findings 3.1 The Commission investigated the alleged contravention and found the following: 3.1.1. The Transaction resulted in the change of Edwin's control, which change of control constituted a merger in terms of section 12(1) of the Act. 3.1.2. Further, the Commission found that the threshold for an intermediate merger as defined in section 11 (5)(b) as read with section 11 (1) of the Act and Notice 253 of 2001 was met in respect of the Transaction. 3.1.3. Further, the Commission found that the merging parties implemented the merger prior to the notification of and approval by the Commission in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act.
4. Admissions 4.1. The Respondents admit that the Transaction constituted a notifiable intermediate merger as defined in Section 11(5)(b) of the Act 4.2. The Respondents further admit that the merger was implemented prior to notification and approval of the Commission in contravention of Section 13A(3) of the Act. 4.3. The Respondents further admit that both WBHO and Edwin were responsible for notifying the Commission of the Transaction.
5. Compliance with the Act The Respondents agree and undertake to: 5.1. refrain from engaging in prior implementation of notifiable mergers in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act; and 5.2 continue to implement the existing compliance programme already adopted by the Respondents.
6. Administrative penalty The Respondents admit that they are each liable to pay an administrative penalty in terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) read with section 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2) and (3) of the Act
WBHO agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R1 000 000 (One Million Rand), and Edwin agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R100 000 (One Hundred Thousand Rand). Each penalty shall be payable within 7 (seven) days of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal. The administrative penalty is payable into the bank account of the Commission whose, banking details are: Bank: ABSA Bank Name of account: Competition Commission Account Number 4050778576 Branch Code: 323345 6.5. Proof of payment of the administrative penalty amounts will emailed to the Commission marked for the attention of the Manager of Mergers & Acquisitions. 6.6. The Commission will pay over the penalty amount to the National Revenue Fund referred to in section 59(4) of the Act.
7. Full and final settlement This Consent Agreement, upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal, concludes al! proceedings between the Commission and the Respondents in relation to the contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act, investigated under the Commission's case number: 2009Aug4617.
1. Definitions
For the purposes of this Consent Agreement the following definitions shall apply:
1.1 "Ac? means the Competition Act 89 of 1998 (as amended).
1.2. "Commission" means the Competition Commission of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 19 of the Act, with its principal
place of business at Building C, Mulayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng.
1.3. "Tribunaf means the Competition Tribunal of South Africa, a statutory body established in terms of Section 26 of the Act with its principal
place of business at Building C, Muiayo Building, dti Campus, cnr Meintjies & Esselen Streets, Pretoria, Gauteng.
1.4. "Consent Agreement means this written consent agreement duly signed by the Commission, WBHO and Edwin.
1.5. WBHO- means-WBHO Constraotion (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. WBHO is ultimately controlled by Wilson Bayly Holmes-Ovcon Limited, a public company listed on the JSE Limited.
1.6. "Edwin" means Edwin Construction (Proprietary) Limited a private company which has its principal place of business at 53 Andries Street, Wynberg, Sandton. Edwin is as at the date of signature of this Consent Agreement controlled by WBHO.
1.7. "Respondents" means Edwin and WBHO collectively.
2. Background facts
2.1. The First Transaction
2.1.1. On 2 June 2005, a shareholders' agreement was entered into between WBHO and Mr Edwin Maila (a shareholder of Edwin) to regulate and govern their relationship as shareholders of Edwin. The shareholders agreement formed part of a transaction in terms of which WBHO acquired 49% of the issued share capital of Edwin for R49 ("the First Transaction"). In terms of the shareholders agreement, WBHO obtained the right to appoint the majority of the directors of Edwin and accordingly in terms of Section 12(2)(c) of the Act acquired sole, de jura control over Edwin as a result of the First Transaction.
2.1.2. The First Transaction was not notified to the Commission as required by the provisions of section 13A of the Act. The Respondents implemented the First Transaction immediately after the conclusion of the shareholders agreement.
2.2. The Second Transaction
2.2.1. During May 2008, WBHO and Mr Maila concluded heads of agreement for, inter alia, thetransfer of a further 8% of the shares in Edwin to WBHO, increasing WBHO shareholding from 49% to 57% of the issued share capital of Edwin ("the Second Transaction").
2.2.2. The Respondents implemented the Second Transaction after the conclusion of heads of agreement : "
2.2.3. The First and Second Transaction shall hereinafter be collectively referred to as the "Transaction".
2.2.4 Failure to notify the Transaction only came to the attention of the Respondents when the auditors BDO Spencer Steward Inc ("BDO") were auditing WBHO's financial statements for the financial year ending 30 June 2009. BDO raised the question as to whether the acquisition of control by WBHO over Edwin had been notified to the Commission.
2.2.5. WBHO advised the Commission that immediately upon receiving the query from BDO it contacted its legal advisors, Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc ("CDH"), to check whether the Transaction required compulsory notification to the Commission. CDH confirmed that the Transaction required notification and was instructed by WBHO to bring this fact to the attention of the Commission and to resolve the issue as soon as possible.
2.2.6. The Commission met with CDH and a representative of WBHO on 28 July 2009, and advised the parties to notify the Transaction as soon as possible and to provide factual background to the failure to notify.
2.2.7. The Transaction was notified to the Commission on 18 August 2009 as an intermediate merger, which was approved by the Commission 29 September 2009, under case number: 2009Aug4617.
3. Commission's investigation and findings
3.1 The Commission investigated the alleged contravention and found the following:
3.1.1. The Transaction resulted in the change of Edwin's control, which change of control constituted a merger in terms of section 12(1) of the Act.
3.1.2. Further, the Commission found that the threshold for an intermediate merger as defined in section 11 (5)(b) as read with section 11 (1) of the Act and Notice 253 of 2001 was met in respect of the Transaction.
3.1.3. Further, the Commission found that the merging parties implemented the merger prior to the notification of and approval by the Commission in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act.
4. Admissions
4.1. The Respondents admit that the Transaction constituted a notifiable intermediate merger as defined in Section 11(5)(b) of the Act
4.2. The Respondents further admit that the merger was implemented prior to notification and approval of the Commission in contravention of Section 13A(3) of the Act.
4.3. The Respondents further admit that both WBHO and Edwin were responsible for notifying the Commission of the Transaction.
5. Compliance with the Act
The Respondents agree and undertake to:
5.1. refrain from engaging in prior implementation of notifiable mergers in contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act; and
5.2 continue to implement the existing compliance programme already adopted by the Respondents.
6. Administrative penalty
The Respondents admit that they are each liable to pay an administrative penalty in terms of section 58(1)(a)(iii) read with section 59(1)(d)(iv), 59(2) and (3) of the Act
WBHO agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R1 000 000 (One Million Rand), and Edwin agrees to pay an administrative penalty of R100 000 (One Hundred Thousand Rand).
Each penalty shall be payable within 7 (seven) days of the confirmation of this Consent Agreement as an order of the Tribunal.
The administrative penalty is payable into the bank account of the Commission whose, banking details are:
Bank: ABSA Bank
Name of account: Competition Commission
Account Number 4050778576
Branch Code: 323345
6.5. Proof of payment of the administrative penalty amounts will emailed to the Commission marked for the attention of the Manager of Mergers & Acquisitions.
6.6. The Commission will pay over the penalty amount to the National Revenue Fund referred to in section 59(4) of the Act.
7. Full and final settlement
This Consent Agreement, upon confirmation thereof as a consent order by the Tribunal, concludes al! proceedings between the Commission and the Respondents in relation to the contravention of section 13A(3) of the Act, investigated under the Commission's case number: 2009Aug4617.
Date and signed at Sandtonon this the 18th day of October 2010
WHBO Construction (Prorietary) Limited
Date and signed at Sandtonon this the 19th day of October 2010
Edwin Construction (Prorietary) Limited
Date and signed at Pretoria on this the 26th day of October 2010
Competition Commission
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.