Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd v CCMA and Others (C734/2014) [2015] ZALCCT 75 (2 October 2015)
The court found that the applicant failed to apply for condonation for the late filing of the review application in relation to the default arbitration award, depriving the court of jurisdiction to entertain a review against that award. Regarding the rescission ruling, the applicant's explanation for the delay was inadequate, and it failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of proper service of the notice of set down. The applicant's reliance on the consultancy agreement was rejected, as the substance of the relationship indicated employment. The prospects of success in the review were found to be poor, and the threshold for interference with the CCMA's decision was...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCCT 75
- Parties
- Applicant: Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: CCMA; Respondent: John M Saivhe N.O; Respondent: Mohau Ntaopane N.O; Respondent: Veronica Bowie
- Court
- Labour Court Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 2 October 2015
- Case Number
- C734/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Review; Review of Arbitration Award and Rescission Ruling
- Outcome
- Application for condonation dismissed; applicant to pay costs including travel and accommodation of fourth respondent's attorney.
- Judges
- Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Rescission of Award, Unfair Suspension, Employment Relationship, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
CCMA
Respondent
John M Saivhe N.O
Respondent
Mohau Ntaopane N.O
Respondent
Veronica Bowie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Review; Review of Arbitration Award and Rescission Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to condonation for the late filing of the review application.
- 2 Whether the rescission ruling and default arbitration award were issued erroneously in the absence of the applicant.
- 3 Whether the fourth respondent was an employee or an independent contractor.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to apply for condonation for the late filing of the review application in relation to the default arbitration award, depriving the court of jurisdiction to entertain a review against that award. Regarding the rescission ruling, the applicant's explanation for the delay was inadequate, and it failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut the presumption of proper service of the notice of set down. The applicant's reliance on the consultancy agreement was rejected, as the substance of the relationship indicated employment. The prospects of success in the review were found to be poor, and the threshold for interference with the CCMA's decision was...
Court Disposition
Application for condonation dismissed; applicant to pay costs including travel and accommodation of fourth respondent's attorney.
Orders
- The application to condone the late filing of the application for review is dismissed.
- The applicant is to pay the costs of these proceedings, such costs to include the travel and accommodation costs of the fourth respondent’s attorney reasonably incurred in relation to his attendance at court in Cape Town on 16 September 2015.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment