Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (CA7/2016) [2017] ZALAC 74 (30 November 2017)
The Labour Appeal Court held that the Labour Court correctly refused condonation for the late filing of the review application of the rescission ruling. The appellant failed to provide an adequate explanation for the delay, as no confirmatory affidavit from its CEO was submitted to substantiate the claim that the notice of set down was not received. The appellant’s assertion of good prospects of success was unsupported, as the evidence indicated that an employment relationship existed between Ms Bowie and the appellant, contrary to the appellant’s claim. The Labour Court also correctly found it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the review of the default arbitration award, as no condonation...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALAC 74
- Parties
- Appellant: Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: John M Siavhe; Respondent: Mohau Ntaopane; Respondent: Verona Bowie
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2017
- Case Number
- CA7/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Refusing Condonation for Late Review Application
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Musi JA, Coppin JA, Savage AJA
- Legal Topics
- Condonation, Unfair Suspension, Default Arbitration Award, Employment Relationship, Rescission of Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Computer Storage Services Africa (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
John M Siavhe
Respondent
Mohau Ntaopane
Respondent
Verona Bowie
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Refusing Condonation for Late Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Labour Court erred in refusing condonation for the late filing of the review application of the rescission ruling.
- 2 Whether the Labour Court had jurisdiction to entertain the review of the default arbitration award in the absence of a condonation application for the late filing.
- 3 Whether the appellant established prospects of success in the review application.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that the Labour Court correctly refused condonation for the late filing of the review application of the rescission ruling. The appellant failed to provide an adequate explanation for the delay, as no confirmatory affidavit from its CEO was submitted to substantiate the claim that the notice of set down was not received. The appellant’s assertion of good prospects of success was unsupported, as the evidence indicated that an employment relationship existed between Ms Bowie and the appellant, contrary to the appellant’s claim. The Labour Court also correctly found it lacked jurisdiction to entertain the review of the default arbitration award, as no condonation...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment