Constantia Metering Services (Pty) Ltd v Thokwane and Others (37474/2020) [2020] ZAGPPHC 620 (11 November 2020)
The court found that the respondents engaged in a sustained campaign of harassment, intimidation, and extortion against the applicant and its employees. The evidence, including audio recordings and affidavits, established that the respondents demanded money under threat of violence, obstructed access to the applicant's premises, and interfered with its contractual obligations. The respondents' denials were vague and failed to address the core allegations. The applicant faced ongoing and irreparable harm, and no adequate alternative remedy was available. The requirements for a final interdict were satisfied, and the applicant was entitled to protection from further unlawful conduct by the...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAGPPHC 620
- Parties
- Applicant: Constantia Metering Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Eric Pibi Thokwane; Respondent: The Gauteng Tenants Association; Respondent: Lebogang Pebane; Respondent: Saint Jay Manyasha
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 November 2020
- Case Number
- 37474/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Interdict Application
- Outcome
- Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant with costs on an attorney and client scale against the respondents jointly and severally.
- Judges
- S Baqwa
- Legal Topics
- Final Interdict, Harassment, Extortion, Threats to Business Operations, Right to Economic Activity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Constantia Metering Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Eric Pibi Thokwane
Respondent
The Gauteng Tenants Association
Respondent
Lebogang Pebane
Respondent
Saint Jay Manyasha
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Interdict Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents' conduct constituted harassment, intimidation, and extortion against the applicant and its employees.
- 2 Whether the applicant satisfied the requirements for a final interdict.
- 3 Whether the respondents unlawfully interfered with the applicant's business operations and access to its premises.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents engaged in a sustained campaign of harassment, intimidation, and extortion against the applicant and its employees. The evidence, including audio recordings and affidavits, established that the respondents demanded money under threat of violence, obstructed access to the applicant's premises, and interfered with its contractual obligations. The respondents' denials were vague and failed to address the core allegations. The applicant faced ongoing and irreparable harm, and no adequate alternative remedy was available. The requirements for a final interdict were satisfied, and the applicant was entitled to protection from further unlawful conduct by the...
Court Disposition
Final interdict granted in favour of the applicant with costs on an attorney and client scale against the respondents jointly and severally.
Orders
- The respondents are interdicted and prohibited from harassing, intimidating or threatening the applicant and its employees.
- The respondents are interdicted and prohibited from extorting or attempting to extort funds from the applicant and its employees.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment