Conti Print CC v Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR3304/09) [2014] ZALCJHB 169 (13 May 2014)

Conti Print CC v Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR3304/09) [2014] ZALCJHB 169 (13 May 2014)

The court considered the grounds for appeal advanced by the applicant and the opposing submissions of the third respondent. Upon review, the court found that there are reasonable prospects that another court could reach a different conclusion regarding the judgment delivered on 28 May 2013. Accordingly, leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] ZALCJHB 169
Parties
Applicant: Conti Print CC; Respondent: Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Mohamed Raffee N.O.; Respondent: Gladys Molokwane
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
13 May 2014
Case Number
JR3304/09
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted.
Judges
Naidoo
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Review of Arbitration Award
Labour Law Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Review of Arbitration Award

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Conti Print CC

Applicant

Commission For Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Commissioner Mohamed Raffee N.O.

Respondent

Gladys Molokwane

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court may reach a different conclusion on the merits of the judgment handed down on 28 May 2013.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the grounds for appeal advanced by the applicant and the opposing submissions of the third respondent. Upon review, the court found that there are reasonable prospects that another court could reach a different conclusion regarding the judgment delivered on 28 May 2013. Accordingly, leave to appeal was granted.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted.

Orders

  • The applicant's application for leave to appeal is granted.
  • There is no order as to costs.