Cooper v Smit and Others (66075/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 281 (28 April 2021)

Cooper v Smit and Others (66075/2018) [2021] ZAGPPHC 281 (28 April 2021)

The court applied the statutory test under section 17 of the Superior Courts Act, considering whether another court would come to a different decision. After reviewing the grounds for appeal and the main judgment, the court found that all issues raised had been fully considered and there were no reasonable prospects of success. The court concluded that there was no prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion, and thus the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Citation
[2021] ZAGPPHC 281
Parties
Applicant: Craig Stanley Cooper; Respondent: Babsie Smit; Respondent: SA Home Loans (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
28 April 2021
Case Number
66075/2018
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench or Supreme Court of Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Shabalala
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects of Success, Superior Courts Act, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Reasonable Prospects of Success Superior Courts Act Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Craig Stanley Cooper

Applicant

Babsie Smit

Respondent

SA Home Loans (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Registrar of Deeds

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal to the Full Bench or Supreme Court of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal meets the statutory threshold under section 17 of the Superior Courts Act.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different decision.
  3. 3 Whether there is any compelling reason for the appeal to be heard.

Ratio Decidendi

The court applied the statutory test under section 17 of the Superior Courts Act, considering whether another court would come to a different decision. After reviewing the grounds for appeal and the main judgment, the court found that all issues raised had been fully considered and there were no reasonable prospects of success. The court concluded that there was no prospect that another court would reach a different conclusion, and thus the application for leave to appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.