Coopers & Lybrand and Others v Bryant (459/93) [1995] ZASCA 64; 1995 (3) SA 761 (AD); [1995] 2 All SA 635 (A) (30 May 1995)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the deed of cession executed by Mr Bryant in favour of Standard Bank was intended to provide continuing security for banking facilities related to his trading business, not his personal affairs. The language of the cession, when interpreted in context and considering the background circumstances, referred only to business debts and claims arising from the trading business. The phrase 'and other debts and claims of whatsoever nature' did not extend to personal claims such as the one against the appellants. Therefore, Mr Bryant retained locus standi to pursue his claim against the appellants, and the cession did not divest him of this right.
- Citation
- [1995] ZASCA 64
- Parties
- Appellant: Coopers & Lybrand; Appellant: Coopers Theron Du Toit; Appellant: Coopers & Lybrand Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Rolf Anthony Bryant
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 May 1995
- Case Number
- 459/93
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From East London Circuit Court; Special Plea Dismissed; Leave to Appeal Granted
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Joubert, EM Grosskopf, Steyn, Nienaber, Howie
- Legal Topics
- Cession of Claims, Interpretation of Contracts, Locus Standi, In Securitatem Debiti
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coopers & Lybrand
Appellant
Coopers Theron Du Toit
Appellant
Coopers & Lybrand Services (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Rolf Anthony Bryant
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From East London Circuit Court; Special Plea Dismissed; Leave to Appeal Granted
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deed of cession executed by Mr Bryant in favour of Standard Bank divested him of locus standi to institute the present action against the appellants.
- 2 Whether the terms of the deed of cession are broad enough to encompass Mr Bryant's claim against the appellants.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the deed of cession executed by Mr Bryant in favour of Standard Bank was intended to provide continuing security for banking facilities related to his trading business, not his personal affairs. The language of the cession, when interpreted in context and considering the background circumstances, referred only to business debts and claims arising from the trading business. The phrase 'and other debts and claims of whatsoever nature' did not extend to personal claims such as the one against the appellants. Therefore, Mr Bryant retained locus standi to pursue his claim against the appellants, and the cession did not divest him of this right.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment