Cos Vrystaat Kaap Bedryf Beperk v du Plessis and Another (2803/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 193 (19 October 2017)

Cos Vrystaat Kaap Bedryf Beperk v du Plessis and Another (2803/2017) [2017] ZAFSHC 193 (19 October 2017)

The court found that the plaintiff had established a clear case for summary judgment by producing a valid deed of suretyship and a certificate of balance evidencing the liquidated amount owed. The defendants failed to disclose any bona fide defence on the merits, and their procedural objections regarding the summons and jurisdiction were unfounded. The deed of suretyship expressly waived the requirement for notice of default to the sureties, and jurisdiction in the High Court was contractually agreed. The claim was for a liquidated amount, and the defendants' affidavits did not raise any factual disputes that would constitute a defence if proven at trial. Accordingly, summary judgment was...

Citation
[2017] ZAFSHC 193
Parties
Plaintiff: Cos Vrystaat Kaap Bedryf Beperk; Defendant: Willem Abraham du Plessis; Defendant: Isabel du Plessis
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 October 2017
Case Number
2803/2017
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment After Appearance to Defend
Outcome
Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally.
Judges
C Reinders
Legal Topics
Summary Judgment, Suretyship, Liquidated Claim, Jurisdiction, Certificate of Balance
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Summary Judgment Suretyship Liquidated Claim Jurisdiction Certificate of Balance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Cos Vrystaat Kaap Bedryf Beperk

Plaintiff

Willem Abraham du Plessis

Defendant

Isabel du Plessis

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment After Appearance to Defend

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff has established a clear case for summary judgment against the defendants.
  2. 2 Whether the defendants have disclosed a bona fide defence to the claim.
  3. 3 Whether the claim is for a liquidated amount and properly supported by a certificate of balance.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff had established a clear case for summary judgment by producing a valid deed of suretyship and a certificate of balance evidencing the liquidated amount owed. The defendants failed to disclose any bona fide defence on the merits, and their procedural objections regarding the summons and jurisdiction were unfounded. The deed of suretyship expressly waived the requirement for notice of default to the sureties, and jurisdiction in the High Court was contractually agreed. The claim was for a liquidated amount, and the defendants' affidavits did not raise any factual disputes that would constitute a defence if proven at trial. Accordingly, summary judgment was...

Court Disposition

Summary judgment granted in favour of the plaintiff against both defendants jointly and severally.

Orders

  • Judgment in the amount of R 269,857.77 against both defendants jointly and severally, the one to pay the other to be absolved.
  • Payment of interest on R 269,857.77 at 15% per annum from 1 April 2017 until date of payment, calculated on a daily balance basis and monthly capitalised.