Crawford and Another v Jarmilla Logie Associates (A3048/08) [2009] ZAGPJHC 92 (10 November 2009)

Crawford and Another v Jarmilla Logie Associates (A3048/08) [2009] ZAGPJHC 92 (10 November 2009)

The court found that there were no reasonable prospects of success in an appeal against the dismissal of the condonation application. The applicants failed to comply with Rule 50, and the previous order dismissing their condonation application was justified. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused and the application was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2009] ZAGPJHC 92
Parties
Applicant: Andrew Swart Crawford; Applicant: Joanne Crawford; Respondent: Jarmilla Logie Associates
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 November 2009
Case Number
A3048/08
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Condonation Application.
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Willis, Maluleke
Legal Topics
Condonation, Leave to Appeal, Rule 50 Non Compliance
Civil Procedure Condonation Leave to Appeal Rule 50 Non Compliance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Andrew Swart Crawford

Applicant

Joanne Crawford

Applicant

Jarmilla Logie Associates

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Condonation Application.

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there are reasonable prospects of success in an appeal against the dismissal of the condonation application for failure to comply with Rule 50.
  2. 2 Whether leave to appeal should be granted in light of the procedural history.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there were no reasonable prospects of success in an appeal against the dismissal of the condonation application. The applicants failed to comply with Rule 50, and the previous order dismissing their condonation application was justified. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused and the application was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.