Crouwcamp v Civic Independent and Others (416/2013) [2014] ZASCA 98 (31 July 2014)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the NEC meeting of Civic Independent on 2 May 2012 was not properly constituted because Damons, who was not an elected member at the time, participated and proposed the motion of no confidence against the appellant. This participation was contrary to the Civic's Constitution, which strictly prescribes the composition and election of NEC members. The presence and active involvement of a non-member rendered the meeting and all decisions taken at and subsequent to it invalid. The principle of legality and the need for strict compliance with the association's constitution were reaffirmed. The appeal was upheld, the decisions of the NEC set aside, and...
- Citation
- [2014] ZASCA 98
- Parties
- Appellant: Nicolin Peter Crouwcamp; Respondent: Civic Independent; Respondent: The Chief Electoral Officer: Independent Electoral Commission; Respondent: Peter Bothman; Respondent: Danie September; Respondent: Jonathan Stevens; Respondent: Aubrey Kuhn; Respondent: Jacobus Damons; Respondent: Adrian Montzinger N.O.
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 July 2014
- Case Number
- 416/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; decisions of the NEC meetings on and after 2 May 2012 set aside; costs awarded against third to seventh respondents.
- Judges
- Mpati, Navsa, Bosielo, Saldulker, Mocumie
- Legal Topics
- Internal Governance of Associations, Legality of Meetings, Ultra Vires Decisions, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicolin Peter Crouwcamp
Appellant
Civic Independent
Respondent
The Chief Electoral Officer: Independent Electoral Commission
Respondent
Peter Bothman
Respondent
Danie September
Respondent
Jonathan Stevens
Respondent
Aubrey Kuhn
Respondent
Jacobus Damons
Respondent
Adrian Montzinger N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Western Cape High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the meeting of the National Executive Committee (NEC) of Civic Independent held on 2 May 2012 was legally constituted.
- 2 Whether the participation of a non-elected member (Damons) rendered the NEC meeting and its decisions invalid.
- 3 Whether subsequent meetings and decisions flowing from the 2 May 2012 meeting were lawful.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the NEC meeting of Civic Independent on 2 May 2012 was not properly constituted because Damons, who was not an elected member at the time, participated and proposed the motion of no confidence against the appellant. This participation was contrary to the Civic's Constitution, which strictly prescribes the composition and election of NEC members. The presence and active involvement of a non-member rendered the meeting and all decisions taken at and subsequent to it invalid. The principle of legality and the need for strict compliance with the association's constitution were reaffirmed. The appeal was upheld, the decisions of the NEC set aside, and...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; decisions of the NEC meetings on and after 2 May 2012 set aside; costs awarded against third to seventh respondents.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs to be paid by the third to seventh respondents jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.
- The order of the court below is set aside and substituted as follows: (i) The application is dismissed with costs to be paid by the second to seventh applicants, jointly and severally, the one paying the others to be absolved; (ii) The counter application is upheld with costs to be paid by the third to seventh...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment