Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd and Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited / Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd (31/LM/May02) [2002] ZACT 38 (4 June 2002)
The Tribunal found that the transaction, comprising two stages in which the IDC first acquires control and subsequently KBH assumes a controlling shareholding, constitutes a single merger for competition law purposes. The rationale for the merger is the eventual empowerment of KBH, and the IDC's involvement is purely financial. The Tribunal held that requiring two separate notifications would unduly burden merging parties, particularly empowerment firms. The international gold market is highly competitive, with many producers and price determined externally, so the transaction will not substantially prevent or lessen competition. The transaction also advances black economic empowerment,...
- Citation
- [2002] ZACT 38
- Parties
- Applicant: Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited; Respondent: Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 June 2002
- Case Number
- 31/LM/May02
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Approval
- Outcome
- Merger approved in its entirety; no substantial prevention or lessening of competition or public interest concerns identified.
- Judges
- N. Manoim, D.H. Lewis, P. Maponya
- Legal Topics
- Merger Notification, Black Economic Empowerment, Market Concentration, Change of Control, Public Interest, Gold Mining Sector
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Khumo Bathong Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Industrial Development Corporation of South Africa Limited
Applicant
Crown Gold Recoveries (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Approval
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the merger, comprising two stages of control transfer, should be notified and approved as a single transaction.
- 2 Whether the transaction is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the international gold market.
- 3 Whether the transaction raises any public interest concerns, particularly regarding black economic empowerment.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the transaction, comprising two stages in which the IDC first acquires control and subsequently KBH assumes a controlling shareholding, constitutes a single merger for competition law purposes. The rationale for the merger is the eventual empowerment of KBH, and the IDC's involvement is purely financial. The Tribunal held that requiring two separate notifications would unduly burden merging parties, particularly empowerment firms. The international gold market is highly competitive, with many producers and price determined externally, so the transaction will not substantially prevent or lessen competition. The transaction also advances black economic empowerment,...
Court Disposition
Merger approved in its entirety; no substantial prevention or lessening of competition or public interest concerns identified.
Orders
- The transaction is approved as notified, encompassing both stages of control transfer.
- No separate notification for the second leg is required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment