Culverwell N.O and Others v Bidvest Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (82188A/2014) [2015] ZAGPPHC 989 (4 September 2015)
The court held that the applicable law at the time of the transaction was section 228 of the Companies Act, 61 of 1973, not sections 112 and 115 of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008, as the latter was not in force when the sale agreement was concluded. It was common cause that the property was not the whole or greater part of Eldacc's assets at the relevant time, so no special resolution was required. The court further found that the validity and enforceability of the sale agreement had already been finally determined by the Supreme Court of Appeal and by Masipa J, making the matter res judicata. The application was viewed as a further attempt to frustrate and delay the transfer, and was...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 989
- Parties
- Applicant: Dustin Montague Culverwell N.O; Applicant: Bernice Elizabeth Culverwell N.O; Applicant: Jan Hendrik Wentzel N.O; Applicant: Peppy Sousa N.O; Applicant: Allan Montague Culverwell N.O; Applicant: Dustin Montague Culverwell; Applicant: Eldacc (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Bidvest Properties (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mercantile Bank Limited; Respondent: Ehurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds; Respondent: The Sheriff, Germiston
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 September 2015
- Case Number
- 82188A/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel (one senior).
- Judges
- JJ Strijdom
- Legal Topics
- Company Asset Disposal, Special Resolution Requirement, Res Judicata, Enforcement of Judgments, Transfer of Property
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dustin Montague Culverwell N.O
Applicant
Bernice Elizabeth Culverwell N.O
Applicant
Jan Hendrik Wentzel N.O
Applicant
Peppy Sousa N.O
Applicant
Allan Montague Culverwell N.O
Applicant
Dustin Montague Culverwell
Applicant
Eldacc (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Bidvest Properties (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Mercantile Bank Limited
Respondent
Ehurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds
Respondent
The Sheriff, Germiston
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the transfer of Erf 134, Elandshaven, Ext 4, may lawfully proceed in light of alleged non-compliance with sections 112 and 115 of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008.
- 2 Whether the absence of a special resolution by Eldacc (Pty) Ltd shareholders renders the Supreme Court of Appeal judgment unenforceable.
- 3 Whether the issue of validity and enforceability of the sale agreement is res judicata.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicable law at the time of the transaction was section 228 of the Companies Act, 61 of 1973, not sections 112 and 115 of the Companies Act, 71 of 2008, as the latter was not in force when the sale agreement was concluded. It was common cause that the property was not the whole or greater part of Eldacc's assets at the relevant time, so no special resolution was required. The court further found that the validity and enforceability of the sale agreement had already been finally determined by the Supreme Court of Appeal and by Masipa J, making the matter res judicata. The application was viewed as a further attempt to frustrate and delay the transfer, and was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of two counsel (one senior).
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
- Applicants are ordered to pay the costs of this application, including reserved costs on the attorney and client scale.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment