Cumulative Properties Ltd v Moolgem (Pty) Ltd (LM142Jul18) [2018] ZACT 69 (7 November 2018)
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant property markets, as post-merger market shares were low and the merged entity would continue to face competition from other market participants. However, the Tribunal accepted the Commission's concerns regarding the potential for the exchange of competitively sensitive information due to board appointments by the target group. The Tribunal approved the merger subject to conditions prohibiting the appointment of common directors and requiring the implementation of a confidentiality and information exchange policy. No adverse public interest concerns were identified.
- Citation
- [2018] ZACT 69
- Parties
- Applicant: Cumulative Properties Ltd; Respondent: Moolgem (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Competition Commission
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 November 2018
- Case Number
- LM142Jul18
- Procedural Posture
- Merger Control / Conditional Approval of Merger
- Outcome
- Merger conditionally approved subject to confidentiality and director appointment conditions.
- Judges
- Norman Manoim, Andiswa Ndoni, Halton Cheadle
- Legal Topics
- Merger Control, Information Exchange, Competition Act 89 of 1998, Confidentiality Policy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cumulative Properties Ltd
Applicant
Moolgem (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Competition Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Merger Control / Conditional Approval of Merger
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed acquisition of control over Moolgem by Cumulative Properties Ltd is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the affected property markets.
- 2 Whether the transaction raises concerns regarding the exchange of competitively sensitive information between competitors.
- 3 Whether any public interest concerns arise from the proposed transaction.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any of the relevant property markets, as post-merger market shares were low and the merged entity would continue to face competition from other market participants. However, the Tribunal accepted the Commission's concerns regarding the potential for the exchange of competitively sensitive information due to board appointments by the target group. The Tribunal approved the merger subject to conditions prohibiting the appointment of common directors and requiring the implementation of a confidentiality and information exchange policy. No adverse public interest concerns were identified.
Court Disposition
Merger conditionally approved subject to confidentiality and director appointment conditions.
Orders
- The proposed transaction is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A, including restrictions on board appointments and requirements for confidentiality undertakings.
- The merging parties must develop and submit a confidentiality and information exchange policy to the Commission within three months of the approval date.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment