Currie v Road Accident Fund (1471/95) [2008] ZAECHC 51 (23 May 2008)

Currie v Road Accident Fund (1471/95) [2008] ZAECHC 51 (23 May 2008)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in total unemployability and significant loss of earning capacity. The actuarial evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and accepted. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for loss of earnings, with a contingency deduction of 5% applied due to his strong work history and prospects. Compensation already received from the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and the present capital value of his pension were deducted from the total award. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to 20% of the calculated travel allowance for personal use, as he would have...

Citation
[2008] ZAECHC 51
Parties
Plaintiff: Johnston Currie; Defendant: The Road Accident Fund
Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2008
Case Number
1471/95
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages
Outcome
Judgment in favour of the plaintiff for damages.
Judges
J C H Jansen
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Contingency Deduction
Delict Civil Procedure Road Accident Fund Act Quantum of Damages Loss of Earnings General Damages Contingency Deduction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Johnston Currie

Plaintiff

The Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Quantum of Damages

Legal Issues

  1. 1 What is the appropriate quantum of damages to be awarded to the plaintiff for injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Is the plaintiff entitled to compensation for loss of travel allowance as part of his damages claim.
  3. 3 What contingency deduction should be applied to the plaintiff's loss of earnings claim.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe and permanent injuries resulting in total unemployability and significant loss of earning capacity. The actuarial evidence presented by the plaintiff was uncontested and accepted. The court determined that the plaintiff was entitled to compensation for loss of earnings, with a contingency deduction of 5% applied due to his strong work history and prospects. Compensation already received from the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and the present capital value of his pension were deducted from the total award. The court held that the plaintiff was entitled to 20% of the calculated travel allowance for personal use, as he would have...

Court Disposition

Judgment in favour of the plaintiff for damages.

Orders

  • The defendant must pay the plaintiff R4,182,306.00 for damages.
  • Interest on damages at the legal rate from 14 days after judgment until payment.