D & H Piping Systems (Pty) Ltd v Trans Hex Group Ltd. and Another (119/05) [2006] ZASCA 29; 2006 (3) SA 593 (SCA) ; [2006] 3 All SA 309 (SCA) (24 March 2006)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent's general terms and conditions, including exclusion clauses, were not incorporated into the contracts of purchase and sale, as no authorized representative of the appellant had knowledge of or assented to them. The respondent was found to be a manufacturing seller, as the processes applied to the raw dolomitic rock resulted in aggregate and sand with commercial utility distinct from the original material. The court confirmed that a manufacturing seller is liable for consequential loss caused by latent defects in the goods sold, regardless of knowledge or expertise, unless liability is expressly or tacitly excluded. In this case, there...
- Citation
- [2006] ZASCA 29
- Parties
- Appellant: D & H Piping Systems (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Trans Hex Group Limited; Respondent: Trans Hex Mining Limited
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 March 2006
- Case Number
- 119/05
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Court a Quo; Preliminary Issues Separated and Decided
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; respondent declared liable as manufacturing seller for consequential damages arising from latent defects, subject to proof.
- Judges
- Howie, Mthiyane, Cloete, Maya, Cachalia
- Legal Topics
- Liability of Manufacturing Seller, Latent Defect, Exclusion of Consequential Loss, Incorporation of Standard Terms, Course of Dealing, Contractual Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
D & H Piping Systems (Pty) Limited
Appellant
Trans Hex Group Limited
Respondent
Trans Hex Mining Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Court a Quo; Preliminary Issues Separated and Decided
Legal Issues
- 1 Was it a term of the contracts that the respondent would supply dolomitic aggregate and sand for use in the manufacture of concrete piping.
- 2 Did the respondent's general terms and conditions, including exclusion clauses, form part of the contracts of purchase and sale.
- 3 Is the respondent liable as a manufacturing seller for consequential damages arising from latent defects in the goods sold.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the respondent's general terms and conditions, including exclusion clauses, were not incorporated into the contracts of purchase and sale, as no authorized representative of the appellant had knowledge of or assented to them. The respondent was found to be a manufacturing seller, as the processes applied to the raw dolomitic rock resulted in aggregate and sand with commercial utility distinct from the original material. The court confirmed that a manufacturing seller is liable for consequential loss caused by latent defects in the goods sold, regardless of knowledge or expertise, unless liability is expressly or tacitly excluded. In this case, there...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; respondent declared liable as manufacturing seller for consequential damages arising from latent defects, subject to proof.
Orders
- The appeal succeeds, with costs, including the costs of two counsel.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with a declaration that (i) the respondent undertook to supply dolomitic aggregate and sand for use in the manufacture of concrete piping; (ii) the respondent's general terms and conditions did not form part of the contractual relationship; and (iii) the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment