D v D (15402/2010) [2013] ZAGPJHC 194 (10 May 2013)

D v D (15402/2010) [2013] ZAGPJHC 194 (10 May 2013)

The court found that the parties knowingly entered into a marriage in community of property, and the joint estate should ordinarily be divided equally. However, regarding the plaintiff's pension fund benefits, the court held that the defendant would be unduly benefited if she received half, given the short duration of the marriage, her lack of contribution to the plaintiff's pension, and the circumstances surrounding the breakdown. The court was not satisfied that forfeiture was warranted for immovable or movable property, as there was insufficient evidence of undue benefit. The defendant forfeited half of her fifty percent entitlement to the plaintiff's pension benefits, and the...

Citation
[2013] ZAGPJHC 194
Parties
Plaintiff: D, T; Defendant: D, A
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
10 May 2013
Case Number
15402/2010
Procedural Posture
Divorce Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Divorce granted; defendant forfeits half of her fifty percent entitlement to the plaintiff's pension benefits; joint estate divided equally; parties to bear their own costs.
Judges
Miltz
Legal Topics
Divorce Act Section 9, Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits, Division of Joint Estate, Pension Interest, Maintenance
Family and Children Divorce Act Section 9 Forfeiture of Patrimonial Benefits Division of Joint Estate Pension Interest Maintenance

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D, T

Plaintiff

D, A

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Divorce Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant should forfeit patrimonial benefits of the marriage in community of property under section 9(1) of the Divorce Act.
  2. 2 Whether the joint estate should be divided equally or subject to forfeiture of specific assets.
  3. 3 Whether the defendant is entitled to half of the plaintiff's pension interest as at the date of divorce.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the parties knowingly entered into a marriage in community of property, and the joint estate should ordinarily be divided equally. However, regarding the plaintiff's pension fund benefits, the court held that the defendant would be unduly benefited if she received half, given the short duration of the marriage, her lack of contribution to the plaintiff's pension, and the circumstances surrounding the breakdown. The court was not satisfied that forfeiture was warranted for immovable or movable property, as there was insufficient evidence of undue benefit. The defendant forfeited half of her fifty percent entitlement to the plaintiff's pension benefits, and the...

Court Disposition

Divorce granted; defendant forfeits half of her fifty percent entitlement to the plaintiff's pension benefits; joint estate divided equally; parties to bear their own costs.

Orders

  • A decree of divorce is granted.
  • The defendant forfeits half of her fifty percent entitlement to share in the plaintiff's pension benefits in the SABC pension fund.