Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd v Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Another (26/LM/Mar08) [2008] ZACT 53; [2008] 2 CPLR 243 (CT) (8 July 2008)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The combined post-merger market shares for the overlapping products were not significant, and sufficient competition remained from other major and smaller players. The vertical relationship between DairyBelle and Dairy World was found to be insignificant, representing a small proportion of DairyBelle's total sales and not giving rise to foreclosure concerns. There was no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales, and the merging parties were not implicated in the alleged milk cartel. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

02

Material facts

Parties

DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker Inc.

Dairy World (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Post Merger Market Share Fruit Juices: ZAR 3.4
  • Post Merger Market Share Maas/buttermilk: ZAR 7.5
  • Post Merger Market Share Cottage Cheese: ZAR 17
  • Post Merger Market Share Yoghurt: ZAR 16.2
  • Dairy World Procurement of Cheese From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 2.1
  • Dairy World Procurement of Butter From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 1.5
  • Dairy World Procurement of Powder Milk From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 2.5

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Clearance / Reasons for Unconditional Approval

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
DairyBelle argued that acquiring Dairy World would provide it with a processing presence and distribution fleet in Gauteng and the northern regions, enabling growth in product range and market participation. DairyBelle asserted that there is no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales and that the transaction would not substantially lessen competition due to the presence of other major and smaller competitors.
Respondent
Dairy World submitted that the transaction offers an attractive opportunity to invest in the DairyBelle brand and expand its national footprint. The parties maintained that their vertical relationship is insignificant and does not raise foreclosure concerns. They also clarified that they are not implicated in the alleged milk cartel.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition unless the parties can show technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains outweigh the anti-competitive effects.

  2. 02

    Clover Fonterra Ingredients (Pty) Ltd and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd/New Zealand Milk Products SA (Pty) Ltd, case no: 92/LM/Nov04

    Relevant product markets in the dairy sector must be defined according to specific product categories such as fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The combined post-merger market shares for the overlapping products were not significant, and sufficient competition remained from other major and smaller players. The vertical relationship between DairyBelle and Dairy World was found to be insignificant, representing a small proportion of DairyBelle's total sales and not giving rise to foreclosure concerns. There was no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales, and the merging parties were not implicated in the alleged milk cartel. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted the ongoing investigation into cartel conduct in the milk industry but clarified that the merging parties were not implicated.
  • The short shelf life of fresh milk supports the definition of regional geographic markets for such products.
  • The transaction is expected to facilitate DairyBelle's expansion into new regions and product segments without harming competition.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2008] ZACT 53

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL

OF SOUTH AFRICA

Case NO: 26/LM/Mar08

In the matter between

DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring firm

And

Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and

Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firms

Panel : D Lewis (Tribunal member); M Mokuena (Tribunal member) and U Bhoola (Tribunal member)

Heard on : 04 June 2008

Decided on : 04 June 2008

Reasons Issued : 08 July 2008

Reasons for decision

APPROVAL

[1] On 04 June 2008 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the merger between DairyBelle (Pty) and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd unconditionally. The reasons for the approval appear below.

PARTIES

[2] The primary acquiring firm is DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd (“DairyBelle”), a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. DairyBelle is jointly controlled by DairyBelle Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Standard Bank Private Equity and Standard Bank Group Ltd.

[3] The primary target firms are Dairy World (Pty) Ltd (“Dairy World”) and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd (“DWP”). Dairy World and DWP are jointly controlled by Charles Frank Meyerowitz and Leonard Isaac Meyerowitz, each with 50% shareholding.

TRANSACTION

[4] DairyBelle intends to acquire 100% of the issued share capital in each of Dairy World and DWP. On completion of the transaction, DairyBelle will have sole control over the primary target firms.

PARTIES’ ACTIVITIES

[5] DairyBelle is involved in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy, dairy-related products and short-life fresh juice products.1 DairyBelle sells its products under the following brands: DairyBelle, Easy Slice, Fruits of the Forest, Rainbow, So Smooth and Sippity, Sterovita, Real, Four Seasons, Fiesta, Guzzla and Striker.

[6] Dairy World is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy and dairy-related products. It processes fresh milk (full cream and low fat), cream, yoghurt, maas, chunky feta and halloumi cheese, nectars and pure fruit juices in various sizes. DWP refers to the property in which Dairy World manufactures its products.

RATIONALE FOR THE

TRANSACTION

[7] DairyBelle states that it does not have a processing presence in Gauteng and thus does not sell any fresh milk in Gauteng and the northern regions of South Africa. DairyBelle submits that by acquiring Dairy World, it would have a processing presence as well as an established vehicle fleet for distribution in Gauteng and the northern regions of South Africa. Further, DairyBelle hopes that the transaction will enable it to expedite the growth of its range of products, extend its areas of distribution and increase its participation throughout all segments of the dairy industry.

[8] For Dairy World, the transaction represents a highly attractive opportunity to invest into the DairyBelle brand, product and service range as well as an opportunity for a wider national footprint.

RELEVANT MARKET

Relevant product market

[9] Both merging parties are involved in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy and dairy-related products. There is therefore an overlap in their activities, particularly in respect of fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice. The transaction also results in a vertical integration as Dairy World procures cheese, butter and powder milk from DairyBelle.

[10] In defining the horizontal market, the Commission referred to a previous decision in a merger involving Clover Fonterra and Clover SA/New Zealand Milk2 were the Tribunal came to the conclusion that firstly, the dairy market constitutes a separate market from the raw milk market and secondly, that the dairy market has different sub-markets. In line with this decision, the Commission concluded that the parties’ activities overlap in respect of fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice and that each of these products constitutes a separate market.

Relevant geographic market

[11] The Commission’s geographic market investigation in respect of fresh milk revealed that the product cannot be transported for a long time as it has a short life span. 3 As such, the geographic market was defined by the Commission as regional. In this regard DairyBelle sells its fresh milk in the Free State, Western Cape and Kwa-zulu Natal whilst Dairy World sells fresh milk in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. We therefore agree with the Commissions’ conclusion that there is no geographic overlap between the activities of the merging parties in respect of the provision of fresh milk.

[12] Regarding the dairy products market, DairyBelle is active nationally whereas Dairy World only sells in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. Therefore, the Commission’s analysis in respect of yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice covered Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo provinces.

COMPETITION

ANALYSIS

Horizontal analysis

[13] The merging parties’ combined post-merger market shares are a follows: Fruit juices 3.4%, maas/buttermilk 7.5%, cottage cheese 17% and yoghurt 16.2%. The merging parties will continue to face competition from other major players in the market such as Clover/Danone and Parmalat.

[14] In addition, there are a number of smaller players who will serve as an alternative to the merging firms in the region comprising of Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. These smaller players include Montesque Dairy, Douglasdale Dairy, Globler Melkery, Smith Dairy and Dew Fresh. This horizontal overlap is therefore unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the dairy ingredients market.

Vertical analysis

[15] The transaction results in a vertical integration as Dairy World is a customer of DairyBelle.4 In the previous financial year Dairy World procured cheese, butter and powder milk from DairyBelle. This transaction represented 2.1%, 1.5%, and 2.5% for each of the products respectively in DairyBelle’s total sales of the products in South Africa. We accordingly agree with the Commission that this vertical relationship is insignificant and therefore unlikely to give rise to any foreclosure concerns.

COLLUSION IN THE DAIRY

INDUSTRY

[16] The Commission also made reference to the alleged cartel in the milk industry, which, according to the Commission involves 8 milk processors, i.e. Clover SA, Clover Industries Ltd, Parmalat, Ladismith Cheese, Woodlands Dairy, Lancewood, Nestle SA and Milkwood Dairy. The alleged cartel has since been referred to the Tribunal for a hearing. The merging parties were, however, not implicated in the alleged cartel.

PUBLIC INTEREST

[17] The transaction does not give rise to any public interest issues and is approved without conditions.

_______ 08 July 2008

D Lewis Date

Tribunal Member

Concurring: U Bhoola and M Mokuena

Tribunal Researcher : I Selaledi

For the merging parties : Cliffe Dekker Inc.

For the Commission : William Kganare (Mergers & Acquisitions)

1 DairyBelle is currently the third largest player in the South African dairy and related fresh produce market.

2 Clover Fonterra Ingredients (Pty) Ltd and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd/New Zealand Milk Products SA (Pty) Ltd, case no: 92/LM/Nov04.

3 The Commission was advised by Mr. Leonard Meyerowitz of Dairy World that fresh milk takes up to 7 to 10 days to expire.

4 The parties submit that Dairy World has been a customer of DairyBelle for the last 12 years.

5

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Clover Fonterra Ingredients (Pty) Ltd and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd/New Zealand Milk Products SA (Pty) Ltd, case no: 92/LM/Nov04

Case cited

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.