DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd v Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Another (26/LM/Mar08) [2008] ZACT 53; [2008] 2 CPLR 243 (CT) (8 July 2008)
- Citation
- [2008] ZACT 53
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- D Lewis, M Mokuena, U Bhoola
- Case number
- 26/LM/Mar08
More details
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Panel
- D Lewis, M Mokuena, U Bhoola
- Case number
- 26/LM/Mar08
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The combined post-merger market shares for the overlapping products were not significant, and sufficient competition remained from other major and smaller players. The vertical relationship between DairyBelle and Dairy World was found to be insignificant, representing a small proportion of DairyBelle's total sales and not giving rise to foreclosure concerns. There was no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales, and the merging parties were not implicated in the alleged milk cartel. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
02
Material facts
Parties
DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd
Applicant Counsel: Cliffe Dekker Inc.Dairy World (Pty) Ltd
RespondentDairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Post Merger Market Share Fruit Juices: ZAR 3.4
- Post Merger Market Share Maas/buttermilk: ZAR 7.5
- Post Merger Market Share Cottage Cheese: ZAR 17
- Post Merger Market Share Yoghurt: ZAR 16.2
- Dairy World Procurement of Cheese From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 2.1
- Dairy World Procurement of Butter From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 1.5
- Dairy World Procurement of Powder Milk From Dairy Belle (percentage of Dairy Belle's Total Sales): ZAR 2.5
03
Procedural history
Posture
Merger Clearance / Reasons for Unconditional Approval
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Does the merger between DairyBelle and Dairy World substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market?
- 02
Is there any significant horizontal or vertical overlap that raises competition concerns?
- 03
Are there any public interest issues arising from the transaction?
- 04
Are the merging parties implicated in the alleged milk cartel?
Party arguments
- Applicant
- DairyBelle argued that acquiring Dairy World would provide it with a processing presence and distribution fleet in Gauteng and the northern regions, enabling growth in product range and market participation. DairyBelle asserted that there is no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales and that the transaction would not substantially lessen competition due to the presence of other major and smaller competitors.
- Respondent
- Dairy World submitted that the transaction offers an attractive opportunity to invest in the DairyBelle brand and expand its national footprint. The parties maintained that their vertical relationship is insignificant and does not raise foreclosure concerns. They also clarified that they are not implicated in the alleged milk cartel.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998
A merger may not be approved if it is likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition unless the parties can show technological, efficiency or other pro-competitive gains outweigh the anti-competitive effects.
- 02
Clover Fonterra Ingredients (Pty) Ltd and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd/New Zealand Milk Products SA (Pty) Ltd, case no: 92/LM/Nov04
Relevant product markets in the dairy sector must be defined according to specific product categories such as fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal found that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The combined post-merger market shares for the overlapping products were not significant, and sufficient competition remained from other major and smaller players. The vertical relationship between DairyBelle and Dairy World was found to be insignificant, representing a small proportion of DairyBelle's total sales and not giving rise to foreclosure concerns. There was no geographic overlap in fresh milk sales, and the merging parties were not implicated in the alleged milk cartel. No public interest issues arose from the transaction. Accordingly, the merger was approved unconditionally.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal noted the ongoing investigation into cartel conduct in the milk industry but clarified that the merging parties were not implicated.
- The short shelf life of fresh milk supports the definition of regional geographic markets for such products.
- The transaction is expected to facilitate DairyBelle's expansion into new regions and product segments without harming competition.
Court disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
- The merger between DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd is approved without conditions.
Source and reliance status
Competition Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
Competition Tribunal
Judgment
COMPETITION TRIBUNAL
OF SOUTH AFRICA
Case NO: 26/LM/Mar08
In the matter between
DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd Primary Acquiring firm
And
Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and
Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd Primary Target Firms
Panel : D Lewis (Tribunal member); M Mokuena (Tribunal member) and U Bhoola (Tribunal member)
Heard on : 04 June 2008
Decided on : 04 June 2008
Reasons Issued : 08 July 2008
Reasons for decision
APPROVAL
[1] On 04 June 2008 the Competition Tribunal issued a Merger Clearance Certificate approving the merger between DairyBelle (Pty) and Dairy World (Pty) Ltd and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd unconditionally. The reasons for the approval appear below.
PARTIES
[2] The primary acquiring firm is DairyBelle (Pty) Ltd (âDairyBelleâ), a company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of South Africa. DairyBelle is jointly controlled by DairyBelle Holdings (Pty) Ltd, Standard Bank Private Equity and Standard Bank Group Ltd.
[3] The primary target firms are Dairy World (Pty) Ltd (âDairy Worldâ) and Dairy World Properties (Pty) Ltd (âDWPâ). Dairy World and DWP are jointly controlled by Charles Frank Meyerowitz and Leonard Isaac Meyerowitz, each with 50% shareholding.
TRANSACTION
[4] DairyBelle intends to acquire 100% of the issued share capital in each of Dairy World and DWP. On completion of the transaction, DairyBelle will have sole control over the primary target firms.
PARTIESâ ACTIVITIES
[5] DairyBelle is involved in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy, dairy-related products and short-life fresh juice products.1 DairyBelle sells its products under the following brands: DairyBelle, Easy Slice, Fruits of the Forest, Rainbow, So Smooth and Sippity, Sterovita, Real, Four Seasons, Fiesta, Guzzla and Striker.
[6] Dairy World is engaged in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy and dairy-related products. It processes fresh milk (full cream and low fat), cream, yoghurt, maas, chunky feta and halloumi cheese, nectars and pure fruit juices in various sizes. DWP refers to the property in which Dairy World manufactures its products.
RATIONALE FOR THE
TRANSACTION
[7] DairyBelle states that it does not have a processing presence in Gauteng and thus does not sell any fresh milk in Gauteng and the northern regions of South Africa. DairyBelle submits that by acquiring Dairy World, it would have a processing presence as well as an established vehicle fleet for distribution in Gauteng and the northern regions of South Africa. Further, DairyBelle hopes that the transaction will enable it to expedite the growth of its range of products, extend its areas of distribution and increase its participation throughout all segments of the dairy industry.
[8] For Dairy World, the transaction represents a highly attractive opportunity to invest into the DairyBelle brand, product and service range as well as an opportunity for a wider national footprint.
RELEVANT MARKET
Relevant product market
[9] Both merging parties are involved in the manufacture, distribution and marketing of dairy and dairy-related products. There is therefore an overlap in their activities, particularly in respect of fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice. The transaction also results in a vertical integration as Dairy World procures cheese, butter and powder milk from DairyBelle.
[10] In defining the horizontal market, the Commission referred to a previous decision in a merger involving Clover Fonterra and Clover SA/New Zealand Milk2 were the Tribunal came to the conclusion that firstly, the dairy market constitutes a separate market from the raw milk market and secondly, that the dairy market has different sub-markets. In line with this decision, the Commission concluded that the partiesâ activities overlap in respect of fresh milk, yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice and that each of these products constitutes a separate market.
Relevant geographic market
[11] The Commissionâs geographic market investigation in respect of fresh milk revealed that the product cannot be transported for a long time as it has a short life span. 3 As such, the geographic market was defined by the Commission as regional. In this regard DairyBelle sells its fresh milk in the Free State, Western Cape and Kwa-zulu Natal whilst Dairy World sells fresh milk in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. We therefore agree with the Commissionsâ conclusion that there is no geographic overlap between the activities of the merging parties in respect of the provision of fresh milk.
[12] Regarding the dairy products market, DairyBelle is active nationally whereas Dairy World only sells in Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. Therefore, the Commissionâs analysis in respect of yoghurt, maas/buttermilk, cottage cheese and fruit juice covered Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo provinces.
COMPETITION
ANALYSIS
Horizontal analysis
[13] The merging partiesâ combined post-merger market shares are a follows: Fruit juices 3.4%, maas/buttermilk 7.5%, cottage cheese 17% and yoghurt 16.2%. The merging parties will continue to face competition from other major players in the market such as Clover/Danone and Parmalat.
[14] In addition, there are a number of smaller players who will serve as an alternative to the merging firms in the region comprising of Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Limpopo. These smaller players include Montesque Dairy, Douglasdale Dairy, Globler Melkery, Smith Dairy and Dew Fresh. This horizontal overlap is therefore unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in the dairy ingredients market.
Vertical analysis
[15] The transaction results in a vertical integration as Dairy World is a customer of DairyBelle.4 In the previous financial year Dairy World procured cheese, butter and powder milk from DairyBelle. This transaction represented 2.1%, 1.5%, and 2.5% for each of the products respectively in DairyBelleâs total sales of the products in South Africa. We accordingly agree with the Commission that this vertical relationship is insignificant and therefore unlikely to give rise to any foreclosure concerns.
COLLUSION IN THE DAIRY
INDUSTRY
[16] The Commission also made reference to the alleged cartel in the milk industry, which, according to the Commission involves 8 milk processors, i.e. Clover SA, Clover Industries Ltd, Parmalat, Ladismith Cheese, Woodlands Dairy, Lancewood, Nestle SA and Milkwood Dairy. The alleged cartel has since been referred to the Tribunal for a hearing. The merging parties were, however, not implicated in the alleged cartel.
PUBLIC INTEREST
[17] The transaction does not give rise to any public interest issues and is approved without conditions.
_______ 08 July 2008
D Lewis Date
Tribunal Member
Concurring: U Bhoola and M Mokuena
Tribunal Researcher : I Selaledi
For the merging parties : Cliffe Dekker Inc.
For the Commission : William Kganare (Mergers & Acquisitions)
1 DairyBelle is currently the third largest player in the South African dairy and related fresh produce market.
2 Clover Fonterra Ingredients (Pty) Ltd and Clover SA (Pty) Ltd/New Zealand Milk Products SA (Pty) Ltd, case no: 92/LM/Nov04.
3 The Commission was advised by Mr. Leonard Meyerowitz of Dairy World that fresh milk takes up to 7 to 10 days to expire.
4 The parties submit that Dairy World has been a customer of DairyBelle for the last 12 years.
5
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.