Dama and Others v Northern Province Development Coroparation (J532/97) [1998] ZALC 17 (26 May 1998)

Dama and Others v Northern Province Development Coroparation (J532/97) [1998] ZALC 17 (26 May 1998)

The court found that the employment relationship between the applicants and the respondent was terminated by agreement on 31 August 1996, when the applicants accepted voluntary retrenchment packages. The payment of salary and benefits for the notice period up to 30 November 1996 formed part of the retrenchment package and did not extend the employment relationship. The applicants did not continue to perform their regular duties after 31 August 1996, and any services rendered thereafter were ad hoc and not under the original employment contract. The dispute regarding salary increases arose from the termination agreement and was a contractual claim, not an employment dispute. As the dispute...

Citation
[1998] ZALC 17
Parties
Applicant: J C Ackron; Applicant: D B Le Roux; Applicant: J M L Steyn; Applicant: G F Steyn; Applicant: T M Dama; Applicant: L P Zaayman; Applicant: A I Van Der Merwe; Applicant: J P Nel; Applicant: O V Mtebule; Respondent: Northern Province Development Corporation
Court
Labour Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 May 1998
Case Number
J532/97
Procedural Posture
Civil Jurisdictional Point / Point in Limine Before Trial
Outcome
The point in limine is upheld and the applicants' claim is dismissed.
Judges
E Revelas
Legal Topics
Jurisdiction of Labour Court, Contractual Claims, Voluntary Retrenchment, Termination of Employment, Severance Pay, Statutory Interpretation
Labour Law Civil Procedure Jurisdiction of Labour Court Contractual Claims Voluntary Retrenchment Termination of Employment Severance Pay Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J C Ackron

Applicant

D B Le Roux

Applicant

J M L Steyn

Applicant

G F Steyn

Applicant

T M Dama

Applicant

L P Zaayman

Applicant

A I Van Der Merwe

Applicant

J P Nel

Applicant

O V Mtebule

Applicant

Northern Province Development Corporation

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Jurisdictional Point / Point in Limine Before Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Labour Court had jurisdiction to adjudicate the applicants' claim.
  2. 2 Whether the applicants were employees of the respondent on 30 November 1996 and thus entitled to salary increases.
  3. 3 Whether the dispute arose before or after the commencement of the Labour Relations Act, 66 of 1995.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the employment relationship between the applicants and the respondent was terminated by agreement on 31 August 1996, when the applicants accepted voluntary retrenchment packages. The payment of salary and benefits for the notice period up to 30 November 1996 formed part of the retrenchment package and did not extend the employment relationship. The applicants did not continue to perform their regular duties after 31 August 1996, and any services rendered thereafter were ad hoc and not under the original employment contract. The dispute regarding salary increases arose from the termination agreement and was a contractual claim, not an employment dispute. As the dispute...

Court Disposition

The point in limine is upheld and the applicants' claim is dismissed.

Orders

  • The point in limine is upheld.
  • The applicants' claim is dismissed.