David Emerkwuru Civil and Building Construction CC v MEC Department of Public Works (Provincial Government) North West Province (1746/2011) [2012] ZANWHC 52 (24 May 2012)
The court found that the dispute resolution clause in the building contract did not preclude the plaintiff from approaching the court after mediation failed, and thus the court had jurisdiction. However, the plaintiff's claim was not for a liquidated amount in money as required for summary judgment. The amount claimed was not based on an agreed sum nor capable of mere calculation, as the necessary certifications and supporting documentation were lacking, and the mediator's recommendations did not specify the quantum. The ascertainment of the sum due would require further enquiry into the nature and extent of the work and the reasonableness of the charges, making it unsuitable for summary...
- Citation
- [2012] ZANWHC 52
- Parties
- Plaintiff: David Emerkwuru Civil & Building Construction CC; Defendant: MEC for Department of Public Works (Provincial Government) North West Province
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 May 2012
- Case Number
- 1746/2011
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Stage
- Outcome
- Application for summary judgment dismissed; costs awarded against the applicant.
- Judges
- N. Gutta
- Legal Topics
- Summary Judgment, Liquidated Amount, Building Contract Dispute, Jurisdiction, Mediation and Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Emerkwuru Civil & Building Construction CC
Plaintiff
MEC for Department of Public Works (Provincial Government) North West Province
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application / Application for Summary Judgment; Interlocutory Stage
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court has jurisdiction to hear the matter despite the mediation clause in the building contract.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff's claim is for a liquidated amount in money as required for summary judgment.
- 3 Whether the plaintiff complied with contractual requirements for certification of the claimed amount.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute resolution clause in the building contract did not preclude the plaintiff from approaching the court after mediation failed, and thus the court had jurisdiction. However, the plaintiff's claim was not for a liquidated amount in money as required for summary judgment. The amount claimed was not based on an agreed sum nor capable of mere calculation, as the necessary certifications and supporting documentation were lacking, and the mediator's recommendations did not specify the quantum. The ascertainment of the sum due would require further enquiry into the nature and extent of the work and the reasonableness of the charges, making it unsuitable for summary...
Court Disposition
Application for summary judgment dismissed; costs awarded against the applicant.
Orders
- The application for summary judgment is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment