Davis v Denton (630/2008) [2008] ZAECHC 138 (7 August 2008)

Davis v Denton (630/2008) [2008] ZAECHC 138 (7 August 2008)

The court found that all parties and witnesses reside in Port Elizabeth, where the causes of action arose. Transferring the trial to Port Elizabeth would avoid unnecessary expense and inconvenience for the applicant and his witnesses. The respondent's reasons for opposing the transfer—fear of media attention, difficulty in finding attorneys, and current legal representation—were found to be either irrelevant, unsubstantiated, or lacking merit. The balance of convenience overwhelmingly favoured the applicant, justifying the transfer of the trial to the South Eastern Cape Local Division.

Citation
[2008] ZAECHC 138
Parties
Applicant: Jeremy Davis; Respondent: Kenneth James Denton
Court
High Courts - Eastern Cape
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
7 August 2008
Case Number
630/2008
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Transfer of Trial
Outcome
Application granted; trial transferred to the South Eastern Cape Local Division with costs awarded to the applicant.
Judges
C Plasket
Legal Topics
Transfer of Proceedings, Balance of Convenience, Court Jurisdiction

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Jeremy Davis

Applicant

Kenneth James Denton

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Transfer of Trial

  1. 1 Whether the trial should be transferred from the current court to the South Eastern Cape Local Division.
  2. 2 Whether the balance of convenience favours the applicant.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's reasons for opposing the transfer are valid.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that all parties and witnesses reside in Port Elizabeth, where the causes of action arose. Transferring the trial to Port Elizabeth would avoid unnecessary expense and inconvenience for the applicant and his witnesses. The respondent's reasons for opposing the transfer—fear of media attention, difficulty in finding attorneys, and current legal representation—were found to be either irrelevant, unsubstantiated, or lacking merit. The balance of convenience overwhelmingly favoured the applicant, justifying the transfer of the trial to the South Eastern Cape Local Division.

Court Disposition

Application granted; trial transferred to the South Eastern Cape Local Division with costs awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • The action in the case of Kenneth James Denton v Jeremy Davis, case number 630/2008, is removed from this court to the South Eastern Cape Local Division of the High Court for hearing and determination.