De Bruin v Van Der Walt (Leave to Appeal) (70441/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 55 (15 February 2013)

De Bruin v Van Der Walt (Leave to Appeal) (70441/2011) [2013] ZAGPPHC 55 (15 February 2013)

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The arguments presented did not persuade the court that another court would reach a different conclusion. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused. The court further held that costs should follow the result, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Citation
[2013] ZAGPPHC 55
Parties
Applicant: Anna Jacoba De Bruin; Respondent: Tjaart Nicolaas Jacobus Van Der Walt
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
15 February 2013
Case Number
70441/2011
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Main Judgment
Outcome
Leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
A M L Phatudi
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Award
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Award

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Anna Jacoba De Bruin

Applicant

Tjaart Nicolaas Jacobus Van Der Walt

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Main Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the main judgment.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant has prospects of success on appeal.
  3. 3 Whether costs should be awarded against the applicant.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to demonstrate reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The arguments presented did not persuade the court that another court would reach a different conclusion. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused. The court further held that costs should follow the result, and the applicant was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • Leave to appeal is dismissed.
  • The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application.