De Klerk v NUFAWSA (JS1029/20) [2023] ZALCJHB 140 (12 May 2023)

De Klerk v NUFAWSA (JS1029/20) [2023] ZALCJHB 140 (12 May 2023)

The court found that the applicant failed to establish that he was an employee of the respondent. The relationship was that of an independent contractor, as evidenced by the appointment letter, lack of employment benefits, absence of leave accrual, and the manner in which services were rendered and terminated. Even if the applicant was considered an employee, he did not provide sufficient evidence to raise a credible possibility of automatically unfair dismissal under section 187(1)(f) of the LRA, nor did he substantiate his claims for accrued leave or honorariums. The application for absolution from the instance was granted as the applicant did not meet the evidentiary threshold required...

Citation
[2023] ZALCJHB 140
Parties
Applicant: Hercules Albertus De Klerk; Respondent: The National Union of Furniture and Allied Workers of South Africa (NUFAWSA)
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
12 May 2023
Case Number
JS1029/20
Procedural Posture
Trial / Absolution From the Instance Application at Close of Applicant's Case
Outcome
Application for absolution from the instance granted; no order as to costs.
Judges
M Makhura
Legal Topics
Employment Relationship, Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Absolution From Instance, Leave Pay Claim, Honorarium Claim
Labour Law Civil Procedure Employment Relationship Automatically Unfair Dismissal Absolution From Instance Leave Pay Claim Honorarium Claim

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 16 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hercules Albertus De Klerk

Applicant

The National Union of Furniture and Allied Workers of South Africa (NUFAWSA)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Trial / Absolution From the Instance Application at Close of Applicant's Case

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant was an employee or an independent contractor.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant established a prima facie case of automatically unfair dismissal under section 187(1)(f) of the LRA.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to payment for accrued leave and honorariums.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant failed to establish that he was an employee of the respondent. The relationship was that of an independent contractor, as evidenced by the appointment letter, lack of employment benefits, absence of leave accrual, and the manner in which services were rendered and terminated. Even if the applicant was considered an employee, he did not provide sufficient evidence to raise a credible possibility of automatically unfair dismissal under section 187(1)(f) of the LRA, nor did he substantiate his claims for accrued leave or honorariums. The application for absolution from the instance was granted as the applicant did not meet the evidentiary threshold required...

Court Disposition

Application for absolution from the instance granted; no order as to costs.

Orders

  • The respondent’s application for absolution from the instance is granted.
  • There is no order as to costs.