De Venter v Minister of Police (87269/15) [2022] ZAGPPHC 392 (31 May 2022)
The court found that the issues raised by the applicant in the application for leave to appeal had already been fully addressed in the original judgment. Upon consideration, the court agreed with the respondent that the application had no prospects of success. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPPHC 392
- Parties
- Applicant: W J van De Venter; Respondent: Minister of Police
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 2022
- Case Number
- 87269/15
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Action at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- M J Teffo
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Costs Order, Dismissal of Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
W J van De Venter
Applicant
Minister of Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Action at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the dismissal of his action.
- 2 Whether the issues raised in the application for leave to appeal warrant reconsideration by a higher court.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the issues raised by the applicant in the application for leave to appeal had already been fully addressed in the original judgment. Upon consideration, the court agreed with the respondent that the application had no prospects of success. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment