De Villiers and Another v Erskine NO and Others (1235/2014) [2015] ZAFSHC 138 (16 April 2015)
The court found that the applicants, particularly the first applicant, had established a special relationship of trust with the deceased, who was elderly, isolated, and dependent. The evidence showed that the deceased was influenced to sell his property at a price significantly below market value and that the right of occupation granted to him was inadequately protected. The applicants failed to provide a credible basis for the purchase price and did not ensure that the deceased's interests were safeguarded. The court concluded that the applicants abused their position of trust, resulting in undue influence over the deceased. Consequently, the first respondent, as executrix and heir, was...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAFSHC 138
- Parties
- Applicant: Johannes Jurgens De Villiers; Applicant: Alison Portia De Villiers; Respondent: Leone Erskine N.O.; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds, Bloemfontein; Respondent: Sheriff of the High Court, Bloemfontein; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Bloemfontein
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 April 2015
- Case Number
- 1235/2014
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Final Determination on Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs, including costs of the postponed hearing on 15 May 2014.
- Judges
- Van Zyl, R
- Legal Topics
- Sale of Immovable Property, Undue Influence, Specific Performance, Rescission of Contract
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johannes Jurgens De Villiers
Applicant
Alison Portia De Villiers
Applicant
Leone Erskine N.O.
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds, Bloemfontein
Respondent
Sheriff of the High Court, Bloemfontein
Respondent
Master of the High Court, Bloemfontein
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Final Determination on Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the deed of sale between the applicants and the late Nicolaas Johannes Grobler is binding and enforceable against the estate.
- 2 Whether the first respondent, as executrix, was entitled to cancel the sale on grounds of undue influence and lack of proper protection for the seller.
- 3 Whether the applicants are entitled to specific performance and transfer of the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants, particularly the first applicant, had established a special relationship of trust with the deceased, who was elderly, isolated, and dependent. The evidence showed that the deceased was influenced to sell his property at a price significantly below market value and that the right of occupation granted to him was inadequately protected. The applicants failed to provide a credible basis for the purchase price and did not ensure that the deceased's interests were safeguarded. The court concluded that the applicants abused their position of trust, resulting in undue influence over the deceased. Consequently, the first respondent, as executrix and heir, was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs, including costs of the postponed hearing on 15 May 2014.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicants are ordered to pay the costs of the application, including the costs of 15 May 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment