De Wet & Others v Opis Advisory (Pty) Limited & Others (2020-14081) [2024] ZAGPJHC 174 (27 February 2024)
The court found that the payment of R3 million by Bapo Freight after the commencement of liquidation proceedings was a disposition falling squarely within the ambit of section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973. The respondents' version that the funds were ring-fenced and not intended to become Bapo Freight's property was rejected as far-fetched and unsupported by evidence. The payment was not made to a creditor but to the business rescue practitioner and his company, and no valid agreement or ring-fencing was established. Even if the payment was considered post-commencement finance, it would rank as a claim against the liquidated company and not entitle the respondents to retain the...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPJHC 174
- Parties
- Applicant: Gert Louwrens Steyn De Wet N O; Applicant: Caroline Mmakgokolo Ledwaba N O; Applicant: Bapo Freight & Logistics (Pty) Limited (in liquidation); Respondent: Opis Advisory (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Sono, Sipho N O; Respondent: Western Platinum (RF) Limited; Respondent: Eastern Platinum (RF) Limited; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Mahikeng
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2024
- Case Number
- 2020-14081
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The payment of R3 million is declared void and must be repaid to the applicants. Costs awarded against the first, second, third, and fourth respondents, jointly and severally.
- Judges
- Adams
- Legal Topics
- Business Rescue, Void Disposition, Companies Act Section 341, Post Commencement Finance, Liquidation Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gert Louwrens Steyn De Wet N O
Applicant
Caroline Mmakgokolo Ledwaba N O
Applicant
Bapo Freight & Logistics (Pty) Limited (in liquidation)
Applicant
Opis Advisory (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Sono, Sipho N O
Respondent
Western Platinum (RF) Limited
Respondent
Eastern Platinum (RF) Limited
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Mahikeng
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the payment of R3 million by Bapo Freight after the commencement of liquidation proceedings constitutes a void disposition under section 341(2) of the Companies Act.
- 2 Whether the respondents are entitled to retain the R3 million or must repay it to the liquidators.
- 3 Whether the payment qualifies as post-commencement finance and how it ranks in liquidation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the payment of R3 million by Bapo Freight after the commencement of liquidation proceedings was a disposition falling squarely within the ambit of section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973. The respondents' version that the funds were ring-fenced and not intended to become Bapo Freight's property was rejected as far-fetched and unsupported by evidence. The payment was not made to a creditor but to the business rescue practitioner and his company, and no valid agreement or ring-fencing was established. Even if the payment was considered post-commencement finance, it would rank as a claim against the liquidated company and not entitle the respondents to retain the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The payment of R3 million is declared void and must be repaid to the applicants. Costs awarded against the first, second, third, and fourth respondents, jointly and severally.
Orders
- The payment of R3 million made by Bapo Freight & Logistics (Pty) Limited (in liquidation) on 28 June 2019 to Opis Advisory (Pty) Limited and/or Mr Sono is declared void in terms of section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973.
- Opis Advisory (Pty) Limited and/or Mr Sono is directed to pay to the applicants the amount of R3 million, together with interest at the applicable legal rate from 28 June 2019 to date of final payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment