Delport v Road Accident Fund (16825/2016) [2020] ZAGPPHC 213 (24 April 2020)

Delport v Road Accident Fund (16825/2016) [2020] ZAGPPHC 213 (24 April 2020)

The court found that the plaintiff and the deceased were engaged, cohabited as a family, and shared household responsibilities and expenses, with the deceased acting as the breadwinner. The evidence established a reciprocal duty of support akin to that in a marriage, supported by acceptance from both families and plans for a formal union. The court held that the plaintiff discharged her onus to prove a legally enforceable duty of support, entitling her to protection as a dependent under the Road Accident Fund Act and section 9 of the Constitution. The defendant was found liable for the plaintiff's proven delictual damages arising from the motor vehicle collision that caused the deceased's...

Citation
[2020] ZAGPPHC 213
Parties
Plaintiff: Desiree Delport; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 April 2020
Case Number
16825/2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Liability and Quantum Determination
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for loss of support upheld; defendant found liable for 100% of proven delictual damages.
Judges
Collis
Legal Topics
Loss of Support, Duty to Support, Cohabitation Rights, Road Accident Fund Act, Constitutional Equality
Delict Civil Procedure Loss of Support Duty to Support Cohabitation Rights Road Accident Fund Act Constitutional Equality

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Desiree Delport

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Liability and Quantum Determination

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the deceased had a legally enforceable duty to support the plaintiff prior to his death.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff's relationship with the deceased qualifies for protection under the Road Accident Fund Act.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for loss of support as a dependent in a heterosexual cohabitation relationship.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff and the deceased were engaged, cohabited as a family, and shared household responsibilities and expenses, with the deceased acting as the breadwinner. The evidence established a reciprocal duty of support akin to that in a marriage, supported by acceptance from both families and plans for a formal union. The court held that the plaintiff discharged her onus to prove a legally enforceable duty of support, entitling her to protection as a dependent under the Road Accident Fund Act and section 9 of the Constitution. The defendant was found liable for the plaintiff's proven delictual damages arising from the motor vehicle collision that caused the deceased's...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for loss of support upheld; defendant found liable for 100% of proven delictual damages.

Orders

  • The defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff 100% of her proven delictual damages in her personal capacity as a result of the motor vehicle collision on 29 March 2014.
  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff the capital amount of R 2 381 315.00 in respect of the plaintiff's claim, calculated as follows: Past Loss of Support: R 402 515.00; Future Loss of Support: R 1 978 800.00.