Denel Soc Limited v Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited (LM214Feb17) [2017] ZACT 18; [2017] 1 CPLR 225 (CT) (29 June 2017)

Denel Soc Limited v Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited (LM214Feb17) [2017] ZACT 18; [2017] 1 CPLR 225 (CT) (29 June 2017)

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, which involved the dissolution of a joint venture and division of business between Denel SOC Limited and Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited, would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The change from joint to sole control did not alter competitive incentives or market structure. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal determined that the transfer and retrenchment of employees were adequately safeguarded by the conditions imposed, including a two-year moratorium on merger-specific retrenchments for transferred employees and negotiated retrenchment benefits for the 18 affected employees. The Tribunal...

Citation
[2017] ZACT 18
Parties
Applicant: Denel SOC Limited; Respondent: Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 June 2017
Case Number
LM214Feb17
Procedural Posture
Merger Application / Approval With Conditions
Outcome
Merger approved subject to conditions safeguarding employee interests.
Judges
Norman Manoim, Enver Daniels, lmraan Valodia
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Public Interest Conditions, Employee Retrenchment, Joint Venture Dissolution
Competition Law Merger Control Public Interest Conditions Employee Retrenchment Joint Venture Dissolution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Denel SOC Limited

Applicant

Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Merger Application / Approval With Conditions

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the proposed transaction will substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market.
  2. 2 Whether the merger raises any public interest concerns, particularly regarding employee retrenchments.
  3. 3 Whether the conditions imposed adequately safeguard affected employees.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction, which involved the dissolution of a joint venture and division of business between Denel SOC Limited and Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited, would not substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. The change from joint to sole control did not alter competitive incentives or market structure. Regarding public interest, the Tribunal determined that the transfer and retrenchment of employees were adequately safeguarded by the conditions imposed, including a two-year moratorium on merger-specific retrenchments for transferred employees and negotiated retrenchment benefits for the 18 affected employees. The Tribunal...

Court Disposition

Merger approved subject to conditions safeguarding employee interests.

Orders

  • The proposed transaction between Denel SOC Limited and Turbomeca Africa Proprietary Limited is approved subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A.
  • A two-year moratorium on merger-specific retrenchments is imposed for all transferred employees.