Denel (SOC) Ltd v Kleyhans and Others (JR 610/20) [2022] ZALCJHB 79 (29 March 2022)
The court found, after considering the grounds for leave to appeal, that the application does not have reasonable prospects of success. The applicant failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different conclusion. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.
- Citation
- [2022] ZALCJHB 79
- Parties
- Applicant: Denel (SOC) Ltd; Respondent: Theo Kleyhans; Respondent: Commissioner Werner Kruger N.O.; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2022
- Case Number
- JR 610/20
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal refused.
- Judges
- G. N. Moshoana
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Prospects of Success, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Denel (SOC) Ltd
Applicant
Theo Kleyhans
Respondent
Commissioner Werner Kruger N.O.
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for leave to appeal has reasonable prospects of success.
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded in the application for leave to appeal.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found, after considering the grounds for leave to appeal, that the application does not have reasonable prospects of success. The applicant failed to demonstrate that another court would likely reach a different conclusion. Accordingly, leave to appeal was refused.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal refused.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is refused with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment