Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd v Minister of International Relations and Cooperation (99014/2015) [2017] ZAGPPHC 190 (22 May 2017)
The court held that clause 5 of the agreement expressly permitted extension by mutual agreement and did not prescribe any formality for such extension. Clause 23, the non-variation clause, applied only to amendments at variance with the agreement, not to extensions contemplated by clause 5. Therefore, the extension pleaded by Dimension Data did not offend the non-variation clause and was not unenforceable for lack of written formality. Regarding the complaints of vagueness and embarrassment, the court found that claims 'A' and 'B' were sufficiently pleaded, as the services and fees related to the agreement and the department had made part-payments. However, claim 'C' lacked sufficient...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPPHC 190
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: Minister of International Relations and Cooperation
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 May 2017
- Case Number
- 99014/2015
- Procedural Posture
- Exception Application / Exception to Amended Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Exception dismissed in respect of clause 23 and claims 'A' and 'B'; exception upheld in respect of claim 'C'. Costs apportioned two-thirds in favour of the plaintiff.
- Judges
- TM Makgoka
- Legal Topics
- Contractual Variation, Non Variation Clause, Service Level Agreement, Vague and Embarrassing Pleading
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dimension Data (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
Minister of International Relations and Cooperation
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Amended Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the extension of the service level agreement constituted an amendment requiring compliance with the non-variation clause.
- 2 Whether the amended particulars of claim are vague and embarrassing or lack averments necessary to sustain a cause of action.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that clause 5 of the agreement expressly permitted extension by mutual agreement and did not prescribe any formality for such extension. Clause 23, the non-variation clause, applied only to amendments at variance with the agreement, not to extensions contemplated by clause 5. Therefore, the extension pleaded by Dimension Data did not offend the non-variation clause and was not unenforceable for lack of written formality. Regarding the complaints of vagueness and embarrassment, the court found that claims 'A' and 'B' were sufficiently pleaded, as the services and fees related to the agreement and the department had made part-payments. However, claim 'C' lacked sufficient...
Court Disposition
Exception dismissed in respect of clause 23 and claims 'A' and 'B'; exception upheld in respect of claim 'C'. Costs apportioned two-thirds in favour of the plaintiff.
Orders
- The defendant's exception that the plaintiff's particulars of claim lack the averments necessary to sustain a cause of action based on clause 23 of the service level agreement is dismissed.
- The defendant's exception in respect of claims 'A' and 'B' of the plaintiff's particulars of claim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment