Dinath and Another v Iginla and Another (079671/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1225 (22 November 2024)
The court found that the payments made by Joshua Iginla Ministries NPC to purchase a farm in the First Respondent's name constituted a disposition without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act. The funds originated from SNS, which operated an unlawful Ponzi scheme and was liquidated, making the payments to JIM NPC impeachable and due for repayment to SNS's liquidators. The Respondents failed to provide any evidence that JIM NPC was solvent at the time of the disposition or that value was received in exchange for the payments. The constitutional argument regarding freedom of religion was not properly raised in compliance with Rule 16A and was therefore disregarded. The bank...
- Citation
- [2024] ZAGPPHC 1225
- Parties
- Applicant: Imran Dinath N.O.; Applicant: Nomvuyo Yvonne Seriti N.O.; Respondent: Joshua Lasisi Iginla; Respondent: Zimasa Stella Iginla
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 22 November 2024
- Case Number
- 079671/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Opposed Application for Setting Aside Disposition Without Value Under Insolvency Act
- Outcome
- Application granted. Payments totalling R3,986,869.25 set aside as disposition without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act. Respondents ordered to repay the amount with interest and costs.
- Judges
- Nharmuravate
- Legal Topics
- Insolvency Act Section 26, Disposition Without Value, Liquidation Proceedings, Collusive Transactions, Church Donations, Creditor Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Imran Dinath N.O.
Applicant
Nomvuyo Yvonne Seriti N.O.
Applicant
Joshua Lasisi Iginla
Respondent
Zimasa Stella Iginla
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Opposed Application for Setting Aside Disposition Without Value Under Insolvency Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the payments made by Joshua Iginla Ministries NPC to purchase a farm in the First Respondent's name constituted a disposition without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act.
- 2 Whether the Applicants, as joint liquidators, have locus standi to bring the application.
- 3 Whether the bank statements relied upon by the Applicants are privileged and inadmissible.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the payments made by Joshua Iginla Ministries NPC to purchase a farm in the First Respondent's name constituted a disposition without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act. The funds originated from SNS, which operated an unlawful Ponzi scheme and was liquidated, making the payments to JIM NPC impeachable and due for repayment to SNS's liquidators. The Respondents failed to provide any evidence that JIM NPC was solvent at the time of the disposition or that value was received in exchange for the payments. The constitutional argument regarding freedom of religion was not properly raised in compliance with Rule 16A and was therefore disregarded. The bank...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Payments totalling R3,986,869.25 set aside as disposition without value under section 26 of the Insolvency Act. Respondents ordered to repay the amount with interest and costs.
Orders
- The payments made by Joshua Iginla Ministries NPC for the benefit of the First Respondent amounting to R3,986,869.25 in purchasing the farm situated at Nooitgedacht no 534 portion 85 are set aside in terms of section 26(1) of the Insolvency Act of 1936.
- The First Respondent, alternatively the Respondents, are ordered to pay the sum of R3,986,869.25 to the Applicants with interest at 7.25% per annum until date of final payment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment