Dischem Pharmacies (Pty) Ltd v Ramashela and Others (JR 978/09) [2011] ZALCJHB 137 (20 September 2011)
The court found that the applicant’s explanation for the delay in filing the review application was acceptable in respect of the rescission and variation applications and subsequent legal advice. The applicant demonstrated excellent prospects of success, and the matter was of public importance. The commissioner’s findings were not supported by the evidence, particularly regarding gross insubordination and unacceptable behaviour. The employee failed to follow repeated lawful instructions, had a history of warnings, and engaged in an altercation with a customer, demonstrating disregard for authority and poor customer service. The commissioner’s conclusion that the employee eventually...
- Citation
- [2011] ZALCJHB 137
- Parties
- Applicant: Dischem Pharmacies (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Ramashela Meisie; Respondent: Ntsoane D N.O.; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 20 September 2011
- Case Number
- JR 978/09
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Condonation and Review
- Outcome
- Condonation for the late filing of the review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the employee is declared procedurally and substantively fair. No costs order is made.
- Judges
- Reddy AJ
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Condonation, Gross Insubordination, Poor Customer Service, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dischem Pharmacies (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Ramashela Meisie
Respondent
Ntsoane D N.O.
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Condonation and Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether condonation for the late filing of the review application should be granted.
- 2 Whether the arbitration award was reasonable and supported by the evidence.
- 3 Whether the employee was guilty of gross insubordination and unacceptable behaviour.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant’s explanation for the delay in filing the review application was acceptable in respect of the rescission and variation applications and subsequent legal advice. The applicant demonstrated excellent prospects of success, and the matter was of public importance. The commissioner’s findings were not supported by the evidence, particularly regarding gross insubordination and unacceptable behaviour. The employee failed to follow repeated lawful instructions, had a history of warnings, and engaged in an altercation with a customer, demonstrating disregard for authority and poor customer service. The commissioner’s conclusion that the employee eventually...
Court Disposition
Condonation for the late filing of the review application is granted. The arbitration award is reviewed and set aside. The dismissal of the employee is declared procedurally and substantively fair. No costs order is made.
Orders
- Condonation for the late filing of the review application is granted.
- The arbitration award under case number GATW 7899-08 is reviewed and set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment