Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd and Stellenbosch Farmers Winery Group Ltd (08/LM/Feb02) [2003] ZACT 15 (19 March 2003)

Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd and Stellenbosch Farmers Winery Group Ltd (08/LM/Feb02) [2003] ZACT 15 (19 March 2003)

The Tribunal found that the merger would result in a substantial lessening of competition in the proprietary spirits market, but not in the value or premium spirits markets, nor in the wine or FABs markets. The Tribunal rejected both the Commission's narrow, category-based market definition and the merging parties' broad definition encompassing all alcoholic beverages. Instead, it adopted a segmented approach, identifying three relevant spirits markets—value, proprietary, and premium—based on price bands and consumer behaviour. The evidence demonstrated significant substitutability between spirit categories within price bands, but not between spirits and beer or wine. The Tribunal found...

Citation
[2003] ZACT 15
Parties
Applicant: Distillers Corporation (SA) Limited; Respondent: Stellenbosch Farmers Winery Group Ltd
Court
Competition Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
19 March 2003
Case Number
08/LM/Feb02
Procedural Posture
Large Merger Review / Final Decision After Hearing
Outcome
The merger is found to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the proprietary spirits market. Remedies will be determined in a further hearing.
Judges
D Lewis, M Holden, N Manoim
Legal Topics
Merger Control, Market Definition, Substantial Lessening of Competition, Public Interest, Efficiency Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Distillers Corporation (SA) Limited

Applicant

Stellenbosch Farmers Winery Group Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Large Merger Review / Final Decision After Hearing

  1. 1 Does the merger between Distillers Corporation (SA) Ltd and Stellenbosch Farmers Winery Group Ltd result in a substantial lessening of competition in any relevant market?
  2. 2 What is the appropriate definition of the relevant product market for competition analysis in the South African alcoholic beverages sector?
  3. 3 Are there efficiency gains or public interest considerations that outweigh any anti-competitive effects of the merger?

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the merger would result in a substantial lessening of competition in the proprietary spirits market, but not in the value or premium spirits markets, nor in the wine or FABs markets. The Tribunal rejected both the Commission's narrow, category-based market definition and the merging parties' broad definition encompassing all alcoholic beverages. Instead, it adopted a segmented approach, identifying three relevant spirits markets—value, proprietary, and premium—based on price bands and consumer behaviour. The evidence demonstrated significant substitutability between spirit categories within price bands, but not between spirits and beer or wine. The Tribunal found...

Court Disposition

The merger is found to result in a substantial lessening of competition in the proprietary spirits market. Remedies will be determined in a further hearing.

Orders

  • A further hearing will be convened to determine an appropriate remedy for the proprietary spirits market in which a substantial lessening of competition has been found.
  • No prohibition of the merger in the value or premium spirits markets, nor in the wine or FABs markets.