DJ LIB Ondernemings BK en Anders v Kammiesberg Munisipaliteit en Anders (1061/2008, 1073/2009) [2009] ZANCHC 63 (3 July 2009)
The court held that the applicants, as registered owners, are entitled to municipal clearance certificates under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, provided outstanding municipal debts for the preceding two years are paid. The municipality's refusal to issue the certificates, based solely on...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] ZANCHC 63
- Parties
- Applicant: DJ LIB Ondernemings BK; Applicant: HKB Eiendomme BK; Applicant: Nicolaas Jacobus Marias Visser; Applicant: Karin Helena Visser; Applicant: Hester Johanna Aletta Maria Venter; Applicant: André van den Heever; Applicant: Jakobus Christoffel Zandberg; Applicant: Gertruida Elizabeth Zandberg; Respondent: Die Kammiesberg Munisipaliteit; Respondent: Die Waardasieraad: Die Kammiesberg Munisipaliteit; Respondent: Registrateur van Aktes: Kaapstad
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 3 July 2009
- Case Number
- 1061/2008, 1073/2009
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment on Both the Interlocutory Application for Postponement and the Main Application
- Outcome
- Application for postponement dismissed with costs; main application granted with costs.
- Judges
- Majiedt R
- Legal Topics
- Mandamus, Municipal Clearance Certificate, Invalid Administrative Act, Property Transfer, Judicial Review
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
DJ LIB Ondernemings BK
Applicant
HKB Eiendomme BK
Applicant
Nicolaas Jacobus Marias Visser
Applicant
Karin Helena Visser
Applicant
Hester Johanna Aletta Maria Venter
Applicant
André van den Heever
Applicant
Jakobus Christoffel Zandberg
Applicant
Gertruida Elizabeth Zandberg
Applicant
Die Kammiesberg Munisipaliteit
Respondent
Die Waardasieraad: Die Kammiesberg Munisipaliteit
Respondent
Registrateur van Aktes: Kaapstad
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment on Both the Interlocutory Application for Postponement and the Main Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to mandamus compelling the municipality to issue clearance certificates under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, 32 of 2000.
- 2 Whether the municipality's refusal to issue clearance certificates based on alleged invalidity of prior subdivision approvals is legally sustainable.
- 3 Whether any of the properties appear on a valid municipal valuation roll as contemplated by the relevant legislation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the applicants, as registered owners, are entitled to municipal clearance certificates under section 118 of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act, provided outstanding municipal debts for the preceding two years are paid. The municipality's refusal to issue the certificates, based solely on its belief that the prior subdivision approvals were invalid, is not legally sustainable. The registrations remain valid until set aside by a court order, and the municipality cannot unilaterally disregard them. The application for postponement pending MEC review is refused, as the respondent has no valid defence to the main application. The applicants are also entitled to...
Court Disposition
Application for postponement dismissed with costs; main application granted with costs.
Orders
- The application for postponement under case number 1073/2009 is dismissed with costs.
- The first respondent is ordered to issue, within 7 days of proper application by the registered owner or representative, a clearance certificate in terms of section 118 of Act 32 of 2000 for the properties listed in annexure KVM1 to the notice of motion.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment