Dodson N.O. and Another v Quattro L Consortium (Pty) Ltd and Others (28472/2020) [2021] ZAGPJHC 433 (17 September 2021)
The court found that Ms Bertheil failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect that another court could come to a different conclusion. There was no misdirection on the facts or law in the original judgment. The grounds of appeal largely repeated arguments already considered and rejected in the main hearing. Attempts to introduce new evidence were declined as procedurally improper. The threshold for granting leave to appeal, as set out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, was not met. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 433
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Dodson N.O. (in his capacity as trustee for the time being of The Griffon Residents Trust); Applicant: The Best Trust Company (JHB) (Pty) Ltd N.O. (in its capacity as trustee for the time being of The Griffon Residents Trust); Respondent: Quattro L Consortium (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Adriana Bertheil (also known as Gilhar); Respondent: City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 17 September 2021
- Case Number
- 28472/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 26 July 2021
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
- Judges
- F Bezuidenhout
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospect of Success, Eviction, Sale Agreement, Misdirection on Facts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Dodson N.O. (in his capacity as trustee for the time being of The Griffon Residents Trust)
Applicant
The Best Trust Company (JHB) (Pty) Ltd N.O. (in its capacity as trustee for the time being of The Griffon Residents Trust)
Applicant
Quattro L Consortium (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Adriana Bertheil (also known as Gilhar)
Respondent
City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Judgment Delivered on 26 July 2021
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant for leave to appeal has demonstrated a reasonable prospect that another court could come to a different conclusion.
- 2 Whether there was any misdirection on the facts or law in the original judgment.
- 3 Whether the application for leave to appeal meets the threshold set by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that Ms Bertheil failed to demonstrate any reasonable prospect that another court could come to a different conclusion. There was no misdirection on the facts or law in the original judgment. The grounds of appeal largely repeated arguments already considered and rejected in the main hearing. Attempts to introduce new evidence were declined as procedurally improper. The threshold for granting leave to appeal, as set out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act, was not met. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment