Donatie v Minister of Police (Leave to Appeal) (1766/2019) [2023] ZAECMKHC 12 (6 February 2023)
The court found that the applicant’s grounds for appeal were largely factual and did not demonstrate a material misdirection or clear error in the assessment of damages. The evidence and legal principles considered in the trial judgment supported the quantum awarded, and the approach of making a single globular award for general damages and contumelia was justified given the circumstances. However, the court acknowledged that it misdirected itself by awarding costs based solely on the quantum of damages and failing to consider the broader constitutional and public interest issues involved, including gender-based violence and police misconduct. The court concluded that there was a...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECMKHC 12
- Parties
- Applicant: Delores Cecilia Donatie; Respondent: The Minister of Police
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 February 2023
- Case Number
- 1766/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Trial Judgment and Order Delivered on 2 August 2022.
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted to the full court of the division against the portion of the judgment and order relevant to both quantum and the scale of costs.
- Judges
- Rugunanan
- Legal Topics
- Quantum of Damages, Contumelia, Costs Award, Leave to Appeal, Magistrates Court Jurisdiction, Gender Based Violence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Delores Cecilia Donatie
Applicant
The Minister of Police
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Trial Judgment and Order Delivered on 2 August 2022.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the quantum of general damages awarded to the plaintiff was appropriate.
- 2 Whether the court erred in making a single globular award for general damages and contumelia.
- 3 Whether costs should have been awarded on the high court scale rather than the magistrates’ court scale.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant’s grounds for appeal were largely factual and did not demonstrate a material misdirection or clear error in the assessment of damages. The evidence and legal principles considered in the trial judgment supported the quantum awarded, and the approach of making a single globular award for general damages and contumelia was justified given the circumstances. However, the court acknowledged that it misdirected itself by awarding costs based solely on the quantum of damages and failing to consider the broader constitutional and public interest issues involved, including gender-based violence and police misconduct. The court concluded that there was a...
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted to the full court of the division against the portion of the judgment and order relevant to both quantum and the scale of costs.
Orders
- The plaintiff is granted leave to appeal to the full court of this division against that portion of the judgment and order delivered on 2 August 2022 relevant to both quantum and the scale of costs.
- The costs of this application shall be costs in the appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment