Draht N.O. and Others v Manqele and Others (18771/13) [2015] ZAGPPHC 701 (7 August 2015)
The court held that the trustees, having control over the insolvent estate, are entitled to evict the respondents from the property. The respondents' occupation impedes the trustees' duty to realise the asset for the benefit of creditors, as the property cannot be rented or sold while occupied. The respondents have no legal right to remain after sequestration, and any alleged sale to Gonda Logistics CC was not concluded. Payments made to Dynamic Auctioneers do not affect the trustees' entitlement to evict, and any disputes regarding those payments must be addressed with Dynamic Auctioneers. The trustees have complied with statutory notice requirements, and the respondents have been given...
- Citation
- [2015] ZAGPPHC 701
- Parties
- Applicant: Heiko Draht N.O.; Applicant: Marc Bradley Beginsel N.O.; Applicant: Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.; Applicant: Dynamic Auctioneers CC; Respondent: Mbongiseni Isaac Manqele; Respondent: Lindiwe Grace Manqele; Respondent: Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 August 2015
- Case Number
- 18771/13
- Procedural Posture
- Eviction Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; eviction order issued against respondents.
- Judges
- Hughes
- Legal Topics
- Eviction, Sequestration, Trustee Powers, Immovable Property, Costs Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Heiko Draht N.O.
Applicant
Marc Bradley Beginsel N.O.
Applicant
Donovan Theodore Majiedt N.O.
Applicant
Dynamic Auctioneers CC
Applicant
Mbongiseni Isaac Manqele
Respondent
Lindiwe Grace Manqele
Respondent
Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Eviction Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trustees of the insolvent estate are entitled to evict the respondents from the property.
- 2 Whether the respondents have any legal right to remain in occupation of the property after sequestration.
- 3 Whether the payments made by Gonda Logistics CC affect the trustees' entitlement to evict.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the trustees, having control over the insolvent estate, are entitled to evict the respondents from the property. The respondents' occupation impedes the trustees' duty to realise the asset for the benefit of creditors, as the property cannot be rented or sold while occupied. The respondents have no legal right to remain after sequestration, and any alleged sale to Gonda Logistics CC was not concluded. Payments made to Dynamic Auctioneers do not affect the trustees' entitlement to evict, and any disputes regarding those payments must be addressed with Dynamic Auctioneers. The trustees have complied with statutory notice requirements, and the respondents have been given...
Court Disposition
Application granted; eviction order issued against respondents.
Orders
- The first and second respondents, and all those occupying the property by virtue of their occupation, are to vacate the property within 14 days from the date of this order.
- If the respondents or any occupants fail or refuse to vacate within the stipulated period, the Sheriff is authorised to evict them after 30 days from the granting of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment