Drummond Cable Concepts v Advancenet (Pty) Ltd (08179/14) [2018] ZAGPJHC 636; 2020 (1) SA 546 (GJ) (14 December 2018)

Drummond Cable Concepts v Advancenet (Pty) Ltd (08179/14) [2018] ZAGPJHC 636; 2020 (1) SA 546 (GJ) (14 December 2018)

The court held that the plaintiff's particulars of claim failed to disclose a cause of action for either damages or restitution. For restitution, the plaintiff must tender return of any benefit received or plead impossibility, which was not done. For damages, the plaintiff must plead the impact on its patrimony and the value had no breach occurred, which was also absent. The claim for the full contract price without accounting for benefits received or remedial costs does not comply with the fundamental rule of damages assessment in South African contract law. The exception was upheld, and the particulars of claim were struck out, with leave to amend.

Citation
[2018] ZAGPJHC 636
Parties
Defendant: Drummond Cable Concepts; Plaintiff: Advancenet (Pty) Ltd
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
14 December 2018
Case Number
08179/14
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim
Outcome
Defendant's exception upheld; particulars of claim struck out with leave to amend.
Judges
Vally
Legal Topics
Breach of Contract, Damages Assessment, Restitution, Pleading Requirements, Mitigation of Loss
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Breach of Contract Damages Assessment Restitution Pleading Requirements Mitigation of Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 22 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Drummond Cable Concepts

Defendant

Advancenet (Pty) Ltd

Plaintiff

Procedural Posture

Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff's particulars of claim disclose a cause of action for damages or restitution following breach of contract.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to claim the full contract price paid to the defendant without tendering return of benefits received.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff's pleadings adequately set out the nexus between remedial work, costs incurred, and the amount claimed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the plaintiff's particulars of claim failed to disclose a cause of action for either damages or restitution. For restitution, the plaintiff must tender return of any benefit received or plead impossibility, which was not done. For damages, the plaintiff must plead the impact on its patrimony and the value had no breach occurred, which was also absent. The claim for the full contract price without accounting for benefits received or remedial costs does not comply with the fundamental rule of damages assessment in South African contract law. The exception was upheld, and the particulars of claim were struck out, with leave to amend.

Court Disposition

Defendant's exception upheld; particulars of claim struck out with leave to amend.

Orders

  • The defendant's exception is upheld.
  • The plaintiff's particulars of claim are struck out.