Du Plessis NO and Another v Goldco Motor & Cycle Supplies (Pty) Ltd (372/08) [2009] ZASCA 62; 2009 (6) SA 617 (SCA); [2009] 4 All SA 203 (SCA) (29 May 2009)
The majority held that the option clause in the lease agreement contained all essential terms for a valid contract of sale and was enforceable. The prescribed mode of acceptance—signing a written contract drafted by the trust's attorney—was frustrated by the trust's agent, Rossouw, who failed to prepare the contract despite the respondent's timeous request. Applying the doctrine of fictional fulfilment, the court deemed the option exercised, as the trust could not rely on its own agent's deliberate failure to escape its obligation. The property was adequately described, and objective evidence sufficed to identify the merx. The court declined to compel the parties to enter into a further...
- Citation
- [2009] ZASCA 62
- Parties
- Appellant: Jan Abraham Du Plessis N O; Appellant: Nicolaas Johannes Smith N O; Respondent: Goldco Motor & Cycle Supplies (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2009
- Case Number
- 372/08
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Free State High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs; order of the high court amended to deem the option exercised and compel transfer of the property.
- Judges
- NAVSA, LEWIS, SNYDERS, KROON, GRIESEL
- Legal Topics
- Option to Purchase, Alienation of Land Act, Specific Performance, Fictional Fulfilment, Contractual Conditions, Description of Merx
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jan Abraham Du Plessis N O
Appellant
Nicolaas Johannes Smith N O
Appellant
Goldco Motor & Cycle Supplies (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Free State High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the option clause in the lease agreement constituted a valid and enforceable option to purchase immovable property.
- 2 Whether the description of the property in the option clause satisfied statutory requirements for certainty under the Alienation of Land Act.
- 3 Whether the doctrine of fictional fulfilment applies where the seller's agent deliberately frustrates the exercise of the option.
Ratio Decidendi
The majority held that the option clause in the lease agreement contained all essential terms for a valid contract of sale and was enforceable. The prescribed mode of acceptance—signing a written contract drafted by the trust's attorney—was frustrated by the trust's agent, Rossouw, who failed to prepare the contract despite the respondent's timeous request. Applying the doctrine of fictional fulfilment, the court deemed the option exercised, as the trust could not rely on its own agent's deliberate failure to escape its obligation. The property was adequately described, and objective evidence sufficed to identify the merx. The court declined to compel the parties to enter into a further...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs; order of the high court amended to deem the option exercised and compel transfer of the property.
Orders
- The option for the purchase by the applicant of Shop 1, Prosperitas Building, 133D Jan Hofmeyr Road, Welkom, from the first and second respondents, in their capacities as trustees of the Prosperitas Trust, for the price of R4 840 000 plus 14 per cent VAT, in terms of clause 5 of the agreement of lease between the...
- The first and second respondents are ordered to take all necessary steps to transfer the property described above to the applicant against payment of R4 840 000 plus VAT.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment