Du Preez v Road Accident Fund (31083/2015) [2021] ZAGPJHC 615 (20 October 2021)

Du Preez v Road Accident Fund (31083/2015) [2021] ZAGPJHC 615 (20 October 2021)

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe injuries in the motor vehicle accident, including lumbar spine fractures, neck and knee injuries, and a head injury. Expert evidence established that she would require ongoing medical treatment and probable surgical interventions for her injuries. The plaintiff's employability was significantly compromised, rendering her a vulnerable jobseeker no longer suited for her pre-accident work. However, the court did not accept the unsubstantiated assumption that she would have zero income from 2025, as there was insufficient evidence linking her cognitive difficulties and seizures to the accident. The court applied higher contingency deductions...

Citation
[2021] ZAGPJHC 615
Parties
Plaintiff: Carmen Du Preez; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 October 2021
Case Number
31083/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of R548,772.50 in full and final settlement, plus interest and costs, and to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses as per section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.
Judges
P D Kekana
Legal Topics
Road Accident Fund Act, Personal Injury, Loss of Earnings, Future Medical Expenses, Contingency Deductions, Apportionment of Liability
Delict Civil Procedure Land and Property Road Accident Fund Act Personal Injury Loss of Earnings Future Medical Expenses Contingency Deductions +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Carmen Du Preez

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for future medical expenses resulting from injuries sustained in a motor vehicle collision.
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to damages for past and future loss of earnings due to the accident.
  3. 3 What contingency deductions are appropriate given the evidence and assumptions regarding future employability.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the plaintiff suffered severe injuries in the motor vehicle accident, including lumbar spine fractures, neck and knee injuries, and a head injury. Expert evidence established that she would require ongoing medical treatment and probable surgical interventions for her injuries. The plaintiff's employability was significantly compromised, rendering her a vulnerable jobseeker no longer suited for her pre-accident work. However, the court did not accept the unsubstantiated assumption that she would have zero income from 2025, as there was insufficient evidence linking her cognitive difficulties and seizures to the accident. The court applied higher contingency deductions...

Court Disposition

Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld. Defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff the sum of R548,772.50 in full and final settlement, plus interest and costs, and to furnish an undertaking for future medical expenses as per section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the plaintiff the sum of R548,772.50 in full and final settlement of the plaintiff's claim.
  • Defendant shall pay interest on the aforesaid amount at the rate of 7% per annum, from 14 days after the date of this order to the date of payment.