Dunlop Mixing and Technical Services (Pty) Ltd and Others v National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) obo Nganezi and Others (D345/14) [2016] ZALCD 9; (2016) 37 ILJ 2065 (LC); [2016] 10 BLLR 1024 (LC) (11 May 2016)
The court found that the third respondent erred by confining derivative misconduct solely to the failure to identify perpetrators, ignoring the breach of trust inherent in the employment relationship. The evidence established that all respondent employees were present during the strike and acts of misconduct. Their failure to come forward, either to identify perpetrators or to exonerate themselves, constituted a breach of trust and derivative misconduct. The applicants repeatedly requested information, and the employees were aware of this obligation. The silence of the employees, in the face of overwhelming evidence and opportunity to respond, justified their dismissal for derivative...
- Citation
- [2016] ZALCD 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Dunlop Mixing and Technical Services (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Dunlop Belting Products (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Dunlop Industrial Hose (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) obo Khanylie, Nganezi and Others; Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Almeiro Deysel
- Court
- Labour Court Durban
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2016
- Case Number
- D345/14
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
- Outcome
- Application for review granted; paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the arbitration award are set aside and replaced with a finding that the dismissals were substantively and procedurally fair.
- Judges
- Gush
- Legal Topics
- Derivative Misconduct, Unfair Dismissal, Breach of Trust, Collective Misconduct, Strike Action, Evidentiary Burden
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunlop Mixing and Technical Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Dunlop Belting Products (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Dunlop Industrial Hose (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (NUMSA) obo Khanylie, Nganezi and Others
Respondent
Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration
Respondent
Commissioner Almeiro Deysel
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Review of Arbitration Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the dismissal of employees for derivative misconduct was substantively and procedurally fair.
- 2 Whether the failure of striking employees to come forward and identify perpetrators or exonerate themselves constitutes derivative misconduct.
- 3 Whether the inference can be drawn that all respondent employees were present during acts of misconduct and thus under an obligation to assist the employer.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the third respondent erred by confining derivative misconduct solely to the failure to identify perpetrators, ignoring the breach of trust inherent in the employment relationship. The evidence established that all respondent employees were present during the strike and acts of misconduct. Their failure to come forward, either to identify perpetrators or to exonerate themselves, constituted a breach of trust and derivative misconduct. The applicants repeatedly requested information, and the employees were aware of this obligation. The silence of the employees, in the face of overwhelming evidence and opportunity to respond, justified their dismissal for derivative...
Court Disposition
Application for review granted; paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the arbitration award are set aside and replaced with a finding that the dismissals were substantively and procedurally fair.
Orders
- Paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) of the third respondent's award dated 16 March 2014 under case reference KNPM 2439 – 12 are reviewed and corrected by deletion and substitution with an order that the dismissals of those persons whose names appear in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) were substantively and procedurally fair.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment