Dunns Stores (Pty) Limited and Shoe City Holdings (Pty) Limited (38/LM/May05) [2005] ZACT 44 (24 June 2005)
The Tribunal found that the combined post-merger market share of Pepkor and Shoe City would be 23.4% in the broader footwear market, making the merged entity the third largest retailer after Edcon and Woolworths. The increase in market share was considered relatively low, and the presence of other major competitors indicated that competition would remain in the market. The Tribunal also noted that no job losses were anticipated as a result of the merger. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition, nor would it negatively impact the public interest. The merger was therefore approved unconditionally.
- Citation
- [2005] ZACT 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Dunns Stores (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Shoe City Holdings (Pty) Limited
- Court
- Competition Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2005
- Case Number
- 38/LM/May05
- Procedural Posture
- Large Merger / Merger Clearance
- Outcome
- Merger approved unconditionally.
- Judges
- David Lewis, Norman Manoim, Yasmin Carrim
- Legal Topics
- Large Merger Review, Market Share Analysis, Public Interest, Retail Footwear Market
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dunns Stores (Pty) Limited
Applicant
Shoe City Holdings (Pty) Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Large Merger / Merger Clearance
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed merger between Dunns Stores (Pty) Limited and Shoe City Holdings (Pty) Limited would substantially prevent or lessen competition in the retail footwear market.
- 2 Whether the merger raises public interest concerns, including potential job losses.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the combined post-merger market share of Pepkor and Shoe City would be 23.4% in the broader footwear market, making the merged entity the third largest retailer after Edcon and Woolworths. The increase in market share was considered relatively low, and the presence of other major competitors indicated that competition would remain in the market. The Tribunal also noted that no job losses were anticipated as a result of the merger. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger would not substantially prevent or lessen competition, nor would it negatively impact the public interest. The merger was therefore approved unconditionally.
Court Disposition
Merger approved unconditionally.
Orders
- The merger between Dunns Stores (Pty) Limited and Shoe City Holdings (Pty) Limited is approved without conditions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment