D.W.T obo L.T v Road Accident Fund (6520/22) [2025] ZAGPPHC 662 (9 June 2025)

D.W.T obo L.T v Road Accident Fund (6520/22) [2025] ZAGPPHC 662 (9 June 2025)

The court found that the minor child sustained only minor bruises to the face, with no objective evidence of head injury or neurocognitive deficits. The expert opinions presented by the applicant were speculative, illogical, and unsupported by the hospital records and academic performance. The minor child progressed satisfactorily through school, and there was no evidence of permanent cognitive or scholastic deficits. The plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proof that the injuries affected the minor child's earning capacity or would result in patrimonial loss. The court rejected the expert evidence and dismissed the claim for loss of earning capacity and income.

Citation
[2025] ZAGPPHC 662
Parties
Applicant: D[...] W[...] T[...] obo L[...] T[...]; Respondent: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
9 June 2025
Case Number
6520/22
Procedural Posture
Delictual Action / Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim for loss of earning capacity and income dismissed.
Judges
Moshoana
Legal Topics
Loss of Earning Capacity, Onus of Proof, Expert Evidence, Causation, Patrimonial Loss

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

D[...] W[...] T[...] obo L[...] T[...]

Applicant

Road Accident Fund

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Delictual Action / Trial Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the minor child sustained a head injury resulting in neurocognitive deficits.
  2. 2 Whether the injuries affected the minor child's earning capacity.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff discharged the onus of proof regarding loss of earning capacity and income.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the minor child sustained only minor bruises to the face, with no objective evidence of head injury or neurocognitive deficits. The expert opinions presented by the applicant were speculative, illogical, and unsupported by the hospital records and academic performance. The minor child progressed satisfactorily through school, and there was no evidence of permanent cognitive or scholastic deficits. The plaintiff failed to discharge the onus of proof that the injuries affected the minor child's earning capacity or would result in patrimonial loss. The court rejected the expert evidence and dismissed the claim for loss of earning capacity and income.

Court Disposition

Claim for loss of earning capacity and income dismissed.

Orders

  • The claim for loss of earning capacity and income is dismissed.