E v E (2013/27961) [2013] ZAGPJHC 262 (24 October 2013)

E v E (2013/27961) [2013] ZAGPJHC 262 (24 October 2013)

The court found that the respondent failed to fully and frankly disclose his financial affairs, and that the evidence indicated he was financially stable. The applicant demonstrated insufficient means to maintain her standard of living and justified her claim for maintenance pendente lite. However, certain claimed expenses were deemed non-essential and deducted from the total. The applicant was entitled to maintenance of R15,000 per month and a reduced contribution of R3,000 towards legal costs. The respondent's willingness to pay for the children's university expenses was noted and accepted. The costs of the application were ordered to be costs in the divorce action.

Citation
[2013] ZAGPJHC 262
Parties
Applicant: E, C L; Respondent: E, V G
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 October 2013
Case Number
2013/27961
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Rule 43 Application Pending Divorce
Outcome
Application granted in part: maintenance pendente lite and contribution to costs awarded at reduced amounts.
Judges
Mudau
Legal Topics
Maintenance Pendente Lite, Contribution to Costs, Divorce Proceedings
Family and Children Civil Procedure Maintenance Pendente Lite Contribution to Costs Divorce Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E, C L

Applicant

E, V G

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Rule 43 Application Pending Divorce

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to maintenance pendente lite pending the divorce action.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to a contribution towards her legal costs.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent has disclosed his true financial means.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the respondent failed to fully and frankly disclose his financial affairs, and that the evidence indicated he was financially stable. The applicant demonstrated insufficient means to maintain her standard of living and justified her claim for maintenance pendente lite. However, certain claimed expenses were deemed non-essential and deducted from the total. The applicant was entitled to maintenance of R15,000 per month and a reduced contribution of R3,000 towards legal costs. The respondent's willingness to pay for the children's university expenses was noted and accepted. The costs of the application were ordered to be costs in the divorce action.

Court Disposition

Application granted in part: maintenance pendente lite and contribution to costs awarded at reduced amounts.

Orders

  • The respondent must pay maintenance pendente lite of R15,000 per month to the applicant.
  • The respondent must pay R3,000 towards the applicant's legal costs.