Easypay (Pty) Ltd v Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality and Others (1111/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 44 (4 April 2013)
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to procedural fairness in the tender process, as the objective facts indicated that Centlec failed to provide sufficient technical information in time for the applicant to prepare for the required presentation and demonstration. The disqualification of the applicant was not clearly justified by the tender conditions, and there was no evidence that non-attendance at the presentation constituted an automatic ground for disqualification. The applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the tender process continued and a contract was awarded before the review could be heard, as its rights would be rendered academic. The...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAFSHC 44
- Parties
- Applicant: Easypay (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Centlec (SOC) Ltd; Respondent: Municipal Manager of the Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality; Respondent: Itron Metering Solution South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Smartech Technology (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Robs Investment Holding (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Cigicell (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Dajo Technologies (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 April 2013
- Case Number
- 1111/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review
- Outcome
- Interim interdict granted; applicant's non-compliance with forms and service condoned; costs awarded against the second respondent.
- Judges
- J.P. Daffue
- Legal Topics
- Interim Interdict, Procedural Fairness, Public Procurement, Audi Alteram Partem, Review of Tender Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Easypay (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Centlec (SOC) Ltd
Respondent
Municipal Manager of the Mangaung Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Itron Metering Solution South Africa (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Smartech Technology (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Robs Investment Holding (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Cigicell (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Dajo Technologies (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant was entitled to procedural fairness in the tender process.
- 2 Whether the disqualification of the applicant was lawful and reviewable.
- 3 Whether the requirements for an interim interdict were met.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to procedural fairness in the tender process, as the objective facts indicated that Centlec failed to provide sufficient technical information in time for the applicant to prepare for the required presentation and demonstration. The disqualification of the applicant was not clearly justified by the tender conditions, and there was no evidence that non-attendance at the presentation constituted an automatic ground for disqualification. The applicant would suffer irreparable harm if the tender process continued and a contract was awarded before the review could be heard, as its rights would be rendered academic. The...
Court Disposition
Interim interdict granted; applicant's non-compliance with forms and service condoned; costs awarded against the second respondent.
Orders
- The application is considered as urgent in terms of Rule 6(12) and applicant's non-compliance with forms and service is condoned.
- Pending finalisation of Part B of this application, the First, Second and Third Respondents are interdicted and restrained from any furtherance of the evaluation and/or adjudication process in respect of Bid Number: RFP12/2012 for pre-paid electricity vending services, or executing and/or fulfilling and/or giving...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment